2021
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

doubletD: detecting doublets in single-cell DNA sequencing data

Abstract: Motivation While single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) has enabled the study of intratumor heterogeneity at an unprecedented resolution, current technologies are error-prone and often result in doublets where two or more cells are mistaken for a single cell. Not only do doublets confound downstream analyses, but the increase in doublet rate is also a major bottleneck preventing higher throughput with current single-cell technologies. Although doublet detection and removal are standard practi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genotyping calls were further examined and corrected according to variant allele frequency. Potential doublets or multiplets characterized by the existence of 2 or more cells that are captured within a droplet and linked to a single barcode were identified using DoubletD ( 47 ) and further excluded from the analysis. For genotype clustering analysis of the five known variants ( KRAS G12C , NRAS G12D , APC H1490Lfs*17 , ERBB3 V104M , and APC Q879* ), cells were included when these five variants met the criteria of read depth (≥10) and genotyping quality (≥60; ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotyping calls were further examined and corrected according to variant allele frequency. Potential doublets or multiplets characterized by the existence of 2 or more cells that are captured within a droplet and linked to a single barcode were identified using DoubletD ( 47 ) and further excluded from the analysis. For genotype clustering analysis of the five known variants ( KRAS G12C , NRAS G12D , APC H1490Lfs*17 , ERBB3 V104M , and APC Q879* ), cells were included when these five variants met the criteria of read depth (≥10) and genotyping quality (≥60; ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the cells and mutations in each cell are sequenced independently, the likelihood of observing the variant read count matrix Q for given total read count matrix R and mutation matrix A can be written as follows. We model the observed variant read counts q i,j using a beta-binomial, similar to previous work [33, 43, 44]. The “Methods” section provides the details about the read count model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, and as shown in previous studies (e.g., [ 26 , 28 ]), cell doublets can be detrimental for single-cell phylogenetic reconstruction. When doublets are likely to occur in the data, specific scDNA-seq doublet detection methods might be used to remove suspicious cells [ 71 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%