1999
DOI: 10.1108/14634449910287837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Downsizing and the emergence of self‐managed teams

Abstract: This article explores the effects of downsizing and the subsequent emergence of selfmanaged work teams. Continuous and accelerated change has resulted in massive downsizing activities by organizations. A classical model for the planning -implementing -and design of the downsizing process is presented. Group structure and typology is presented in terms of formal versus informal groups. The impact of groups and group dynamics, the stages of group development, and impact upon effectiveness, environment, design an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hammer (1996) argued that downsizing may result in better teamwork and an empowered multi-skilled workforce which encourage new idea generation, ingredients which are necessary for innovation. Appelbaum, Bethune and Tannenbaum (1999) argue that slow and careful implementation of downsizing may lead to a creation of multi-skilled teams that support innovation in the post downsizing period. This is because, while hasty downsizing may destroy existing teams without carefully planning for the creation of new ones, by taking time to implement downsizing, organizations have the necessary space to think about replacing old teams with new ones.…”
Section: Innovation Enhancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hammer (1996) argued that downsizing may result in better teamwork and an empowered multi-skilled workforce which encourage new idea generation, ingredients which are necessary for innovation. Appelbaum, Bethune and Tannenbaum (1999) argue that slow and careful implementation of downsizing may lead to a creation of multi-skilled teams that support innovation in the post downsizing period. This is because, while hasty downsizing may destroy existing teams without carefully planning for the creation of new ones, by taking time to implement downsizing, organizations have the necessary space to think about replacing old teams with new ones.…”
Section: Innovation Enhancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change affected those who were laid off as well as those who stayed with companies (Robbins, 1999). Many survivors felt that organizations violated the terms of their implicit psychological contracts (Appelbaum, Bethune, & Tannenbaum, 1999;Greenhalgh & Rosenblatt, 2010). This sentiment contributed to a shift from a "one career, one single company" path to a path involving employment with several organizations throughout life, and the focus shifted from the company to the individual's career (Klehe, Zikic, Van Vianen, & De Pater, 2011;Reilly, Brett, & Stroh, 1993;Wajcman & Martin, 2001).…”
Section: Changes In the Employment Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2001), küçülen işletmelerdeki iş yükü artışının, uygulanan küçülmeye bağlı olduğunu ve eğer küçülme uygulaması sistematik strateji şeklinde seçilirse ve işler yeniden tasarlanırsa çalışanların iş yükünün artmayabileceğini belirtmektedirler. Ancak, yapılan birçok araştırma yöneticilerin küçülmeyi etkin şekilde planlamadıklarını ve sistematik stratejiyi seçmediklerini göstermektedir (Appelbaum, Bethune ve Tannenbaum, 1999b). Böylece iş yerinde çalışmaya devam edenler için küçülmüş yeni işletmenin iş ortamı öncesiyle kıyaslandığında, sıklıkla, yapılması ve üstlenilmesi gerekenden daha fazla iş ve sorumluluğu ifade etmektedir.…”
Section: Küçülmeni̇n çAlişanlar üZeri̇ndeki̇ Olumsuz Etki̇leri̇ Ve Hi̇potezlerunclassified