2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doxorubicin and Lovastatin co-delivery liposomes for synergistic therapy of liver cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting with the approval of Doxil ® , several attempts have been made to optimize the active loading of DOX into liposomes [33][34][35], but, when co-encapsulating two active substances, the quality profile of the formulation can be significantly influenced by several variables. To our knowledge, there is only one study that investigated and optimized the passive loading of a statin along with the active loading of DOX into liposomes [36]. The major disadvantage of this study was that the research group focused on optimizing only the encapsulation efficiency of the active substances, without considering the other quality attributes of liposomes, i.e., size, polydispersity index, and drug to drug ratio, which are also critical for an enhanced anticancer effect [36]; therefore, through this study, we aimed to achieve a more in-depth evaluation of the quality profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting with the approval of Doxil ® , several attempts have been made to optimize the active loading of DOX into liposomes [33][34][35], but, when co-encapsulating two active substances, the quality profile of the formulation can be significantly influenced by several variables. To our knowledge, there is only one study that investigated and optimized the passive loading of a statin along with the active loading of DOX into liposomes [36]. The major disadvantage of this study was that the research group focused on optimizing only the encapsulation efficiency of the active substances, without considering the other quality attributes of liposomes, i.e., size, polydispersity index, and drug to drug ratio, which are also critical for an enhanced anticancer effect [36]; therefore, through this study, we aimed to achieve a more in-depth evaluation of the quality profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10–30% and 13–18%, respectively, depending on the solution pH and the composition of the nanocarrier. This initial leakage from the particles is rather lower than that observed from different polymeric nanoparticles and micelles [62–64], nanogels [65] or solid lipid nanoparticles [66], and similar to that of many other anticancer drug-liposome [67, 68] and polymeric micelles and particles-based [14, 69, 70] formulations. However, it is worth recognising that nowadays some few different nanocarriers have designed that completely block the uncontrolled premature leakage of the cargo and allowing its complete release in the targeted site on-demand under controlled internal or external stimuli [24, 35, 71, 72].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…65–70%). This larger toxic effect has been attributed to the targeting delivery of the nanocarrier to the cancerous cells and the synergistic effect provided by the released of the co-encapsulated drugs, as observed for some other formulations simultaneously encapsulating several chemodrugs as liposomes [68, 74], polymeric micelles and nanoparticles [8, 9, 14, 16], nanogels and hydrogels [75, 76], inorganic nanoparticles [18, 19], etc.
Fig. 7Cellular viability of drug-loaded GNRs@HSA/CS hybrid NPs (closed symbols), and free drugs (open symbols) expressed as survival rates for free DTX (filled black square, open black square) and free DTX + DOXO (filled red circle, open red circle), respectively, in breast MDA-MB-231 cancerous cells for a 24 h and b 48 h of incubation as a function of DTX concentration.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, two studies have evaluated the benefits of DOX and statins co-encapsulation in liposomes. In both cases, an inhibition of tumor growth due to synergistic effects between the two drugs was observed [15,16]. Regarding the characterization of liposomes, particularly entrapped drug concentration and drug release profile, it is worth mentioning that none of the studies managed to develop an analytical method for the simultaneous quantification of both drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the characterization of liposomes, particularly entrapped drug concentration and drug release profile, it is worth mentioning that none of the studies managed to develop an analytical method for the simultaneous quantification of both drugs. In case of DOX, a spectrophotometric or fluorescent method was used, while for SMV or lovastatin, HPLC was the selected analytic strategy [15,16]. Additionally, neither of the studies provided a determination of the drug release profile on the co-formulation, excluding a possible influence of active substances on drug release processes, since there is a difference in their physicochemical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%