2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(11)60267-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drag Reduction in a Turbulent Channel Flow with Hydrophobic Wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean velocities from analytical solution of two dimensional Poiseuille flow and force model show a good agreement. In this situation, nearly 20% of drag reduction is observed in both numerical and analytical solutions, which are in suitable agreement with experiment results of Nouri et al (2012). They measured drag reduction of laminar flow in coated microchannel.…”
Section: Numerical Validation: Laminar Channel Flowsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean velocities from analytical solution of two dimensional Poiseuille flow and force model show a good agreement. In this situation, nearly 20% of drag reduction is observed in both numerical and analytical solutions, which are in suitable agreement with experiment results of Nouri et al (2012). They measured drag reduction of laminar flow in coated microchannel.…”
Section: Numerical Validation: Laminar Channel Flowsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They assumed slip boundary condition in streamwise and spanwise direction and concluded that only the streamwise slip velocity led to the reduction in pressure drop. Nouri et al (2012) performed a variety of slip lengths with Navier's slip boundary condition in LES method and confirmed that a noticeable effect on the near wall turbulence structures occurred when the slip length was greater than a certain value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present work revealed the changes of turbulent coherent structures by SH surface and some qualitative conclusions coincide with the results of DNS [13,14], there are still some limitations. Unlike DNS researches [13][14][15][16], the non-contact measurement work of slip velocity and slip length in macro-scale turbulent channel flow over SH surface is still a big challenge by TRPIV technique. The contact measurement method (e.g.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophobic surfaces are known to have a slip boundary condition on the wall which can support a shear-free air-water interface because of the properties of low surface energy and microstructures [4,5]. It is expected that this slip will lead to drag reduction in both laminar and turbulent regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%