1972
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1972.4326541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drain Feedback - A Novel Feedback Technique for Low-Noise Cryogenic Preamplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been developed varieties of self-adaptive continuous and pulsed reset techniques, which are presently used in commercial spectrometers [12]- [16]. Arguably, the best energy resolution versus count rate capability is achieved with devices based essentially on a concept introduced originally in the PentaFET TM [15], [17].…”
Section: Baseline Instability Of Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been developed varieties of self-adaptive continuous and pulsed reset techniques, which are presently used in commercial spectrometers [12]- [16]. Arguably, the best energy resolution versus count rate capability is achieved with devices based essentially on a concept introduced originally in the PentaFET TM [15], [17].…”
Section: Baseline Instability Of Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For low-energy X-ray work (as op-Posed to gamma-ray spectrometry) minimization of electronic noise is of major concern and Pulsed 'opto-electronic' feedback is the most popular method currently employed for neutralization. 'Drain feedback' (Elad, 1972) is an alternative technique used on some commercial instruments; although technical merits and faults are about equally weighted for low count rate ( < 10 kcps), low energy ( < 20 keV) spectrometry, pulsed opto-electronic feedback, in principle at least, offers better resolution for large values of the (energy x count rate) product (Statham, 1979a).…”
Section: Detector Preamplijiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of integrating the first amplifying stage very close to or on the same chip with the detector, in particular, has been investigated [1]. The traditional resistive feedback has proven to be inferior in noise performance compared to pulsed reset feedback mechanisms, such as optoelectronic [2], transistor reset [3], drain feedback [4], or pentafet [5] configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%