2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Draping simulation of carbon/epoxy plain weave fabrics with non-orthogonal constitutive model and material behavior analysis of the cured structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to them, it is necessary to look for more methods that will lead to sufficient accuracy in the three-dimensional drape simulation. One such solution is the precise determination and importation of characteristics of the fabrics in the simulation software, as indicated by Han et al [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to them, it is necessary to look for more methods that will lead to sufficient accuracy in the three-dimensional drape simulation. One such solution is the precise determination and importation of characteristics of the fabrics in the simulation software, as indicated by Han et al [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that preforms will deform on the mold when manufactured to the final geometry of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) parts (draping). [11][12][13] Preform deformation causes fiber reorientation and may lead to manufacturing defects (wrinkling), which has a substantial influence on the laminate layout and consequent structural performance. 11,12 Therefore, the common approach applied at the design stage, which simplifies the layers as design domains with regular shapes and straight fiber paths rather than actual physical entities, ignores the draping effects on fiber architectures of layers and may result in errors in performance estimation and potentially produce designs that cannot be manufactured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faced with such a huge computational gap between the two approaches, scholars often use mechanical methods to perform one-off simulations of specific forming conditions. 11,12 This is typically followed by using kinematic methods for iterative execution to develop the best or most feasible draping strategy, such as the process and cost optimization of aerospace parts. [19][20][21] Further, on the basis of accurate predictions of draping results, a growing number of scholars are working to incorporate process conditions in structural simulations and guide structural designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is simple and fast, but the drape solution is more dependent on the mould geometry, and the solutions are not accurate for geometries which do not have uniformly curved surfaces. Kinematic draping also does not consider the material behaviour and hence results in the same draping pattern regardless of fabric/fibre architecture [8][9][10]. The solid mechanics approach can be applied at the micro roving level, the meso yarn level, and the macroscopic part level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%