Drawing Reproducible Conclusions from Observational Clinical Data with OHDSI

Abstract

Summary Objective: The current observational research literature shows extensive publication bias and contradiction. The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) initiative seeks to improve research reproducibility through open science. Methods: OHDSI has created an international federated data source of electronic health records and administrative claims that covers nearly 10% of the world’s population. Using a common data model with a practical schema and extensive vocabulary mappings, data from around the world follow the identical format. OHDSI’s research methods emphasize reproducibility, with a large-scale approach to addressing confounding using propensity score adjustment with extensive diagnostics; negative and positive control hypotheses to test for residual systematic error; a variety of data sources to assess consistency and generalizability; a completely open approach including protocol, software, models, parameters, and raw results so that studies can be externally verified; and the study of many hypotheses in parallel so that the operating characteristics of the methods can be assessed. Results: OHDSI has already produced findings in areas like hypertension treatment that are being incorporated into practice, and it has produced rigorous studies of COVID-19 that have aided government agencies in their treatment decisions, that have characterized the disease extensively, that have estimated the comparative effects of treatments, and that the predict likelihood of advancing to serious complications. Conclusions: OHDSI practices open science and incorporates a series of methods to address reproducibility. It has produced important results in several areas, including hypertension therapy and COVID-19 research.

Characterising the background incidence rates of adverse events of special interest for covid-19 vaccines in eight countries: multinational network cohort study

“…All datasets were previously mapped to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership common data model, which is maintained by the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics network, an international open science initiative to generate reproducible evidence from observational data. 14 This initiative brings together hundreds of researchers from 30 countries, working with health records from around 600 million unique patients in its distributed database. The analysis code was distributed across all centres contributing to Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics without sharing patient level data.…”

Association between covid-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and risk of immune mediated neurological events: population based cohort and self-controlled case series analysis

“…These hospital data included information from all public and private hospitals in Catalonia (Conjunt Mínim Bàsic de Dades d’Alta Hospitalària, CMBD-AH). 21 Both databases have been mapped to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model, 22 which allowed the same analytical code to be run against both datasets without the need to share patient level data.…”

Integrating a New Dietetic Care Process in a Health Information System: A System and Process Analysis and Assessment

“…To support health professionals in sharing EHRs, integrated communication by means of vocabularies such as SNOMED CT or LOINC is crucial [4]. Therefore, in the future, mappings to other terminologies, especially to SNOMED CT, will enable the international exchange of ICF data in standardized data models [74][75][76] and facilitate big data analysis [77]. To this end, linkage to other established vocabularies is an important goal in addition to establishing a uniform framework and language in dietetics.…”