1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021302118072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drawing theoretical implications from descriptive empirical findings on dream content.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we did not observe a difference in bizarreness between waking and dreaming thoughts. Although we are hesitant to over-interpret a null effect, one possible implication of this result is that, although dreaming, particularly REM dreaming, frequently involves bizarre elements (Schredl, 2010a), thoughts in particular may be less bizarre and more consistent across sleep and wake states (Fox et al, 2013; Wamsley, 2013; Domhoff, 2007) than previously acknowledged (Williams, Merritt, Rittenhouse, & Hobson, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, we did not observe a difference in bizarreness between waking and dreaming thoughts. Although we are hesitant to over-interpret a null effect, one possible implication of this result is that, although dreaming, particularly REM dreaming, frequently involves bizarre elements (Schredl, 2010a), thoughts in particular may be less bizarre and more consistent across sleep and wake states (Fox et al, 2013; Wamsley, 2013; Domhoff, 2007) than previously acknowledged (Williams, Merritt, Rittenhouse, & Hobson, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Current dream research (Domhoff, 1999;Schredl, 2003) and more specifically sex dream research (Clarke, DeCicco, & Navara, 2010;King et al, 2009;Schredl, 2008) support the theory that dreams reflect waking day life, the continuity hypothesis (Hall & Nordby, 1972). King et al (2009) found participants with more sexuality in their dreams reported higher levels of orgasmic experience, sexual daydreaming, and sexual fantasizing in waking day.…”
Section: Current Sex Dream Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using the Hall-Van de Castle system requires scoring all content elements for each dream report, then converting the content element frequencies into percentages and rates for use in various indexes (Domhoff, 1996(Domhoff, , 1999. Domhoff (1999) suggested that by combining various nominal dream content categories, such indexes could be used "instead of unreliable or complicated theoretical rating scales" (p. 123). The Hall-Van de Castle (1966) system is one of several systems that have been developed in an attempt to reflect the link between a dream report and the dreamer's cognition, environment, and behavior.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%