2012
DOI: 10.3182/20121023-3-fr-4025.00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drive Line Control for Electrically Driven Vehicles Using Generalized Second Order Sliding Modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With help of variable structure theory, see e.g. [1], different state observer concepts were developed calculating the shaft torque although unknown external load forces, like road gradients acting on the vehicle [2], [3]. In general, the motor and load speeds and the motor currents are measured.…”
Section: Modeling and Control Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With help of variable structure theory, see e.g. [1], different state observer concepts were developed calculating the shaft torque although unknown external load forces, like road gradients acting on the vehicle [2], [3]. In general, the motor and load speeds and the motor currents are measured.…”
Section: Modeling and Control Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low resolution, automotive wheel sensors cannot measure the speed accurately at low speed such that they are useless for state estimation. Therefore the controller and observer concept can focus on the measurement of the motor angular speed signal only [2]. In general the algorithms have to be implemented in the motor inverter where the control routines run in a high frequency task.…”
Section: Implementation Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angeringer considered the wheel resistance moment as a disturbance and estimated it with a second-order sliding observer. 16 Based on this, a second-order sliding controller was used for anti-torsional vibration control. True used a continuously differentiable tanh function instead of a nonlinear dead time function to describe the backlash and then applied flatness-based forward control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the feedback controllers based on ∆ and can be grouped together. For example, Angeringer et al [23] propose a sliding mode controller on ∆ ; Amann et al [1] and Bottiglione et al [4] present pole placement controllers on , and Lv et al [24] discuss a proportional integral derivative (PID) controller on . In [25] a mode-switching controller deals with backlash: when the gear teeth are in contact, the algorithm selects a category 4 controller, similar to the one in [24], while a sliding mode controller based on ∆̇ (category 3 controller) is adopted during backlash traversing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%