2021
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers for genetic structure at different geographic scales for Pacific red snapper (Lutjanus peru) and yellow snapper (Lutjanus argentiventris) in the tropical eastern Pacific

Abstract: The tropical eastern Pacific (TEP) is a highly dynamic region and a model system to study how habitat discontinuities affect the distribution of shorefishes, particularly for species that display ontogenetic habitat shifts, including snappers (Lutjanidae). To evaluate the genetic structure of the Pacific red snapper (Lutjanus peru) and the yellow snapper (Lutjanus argentiventris) throughout their distribution range along the TEP, 13 and 11 microsatellite loci were analysed, respectively. The genetic diversity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
9
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
3
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… Sunde et al (2022) evaluated the potential that of microsatellites vs SNP data for detecting genetic structure and calculating genetic diversity; they concluded that microsatellite markers are better for characterizing genetic diversity while SNP data are better for detecting genetic structure. This conclusion could be corroborated by the differences in the heterozygosity estimates using microsatellites in L. peru (global H e = 0.811) and L. argentiventris (global H e = 0.757) ( Reguera-Rouzaud et al, 2021 ), as well as our estimates using SNPs (global H e = 0.097 for NL and H e = 0.102 for OL). Notwithstanding the weaknesses of the SNPs for the assessment of genetic diversity, we cannot discard inbreeding to explain the deficit of heterozygotes observed in the present work as has been stated in the brook charr Salvenilus fontinalis ( Castric et al, 2002 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“… Sunde et al (2022) evaluated the potential that of microsatellites vs SNP data for detecting genetic structure and calculating genetic diversity; they concluded that microsatellite markers are better for characterizing genetic diversity while SNP data are better for detecting genetic structure. This conclusion could be corroborated by the differences in the heterozygosity estimates using microsatellites in L. peru (global H e = 0.811) and L. argentiventris (global H e = 0.757) ( Reguera-Rouzaud et al, 2021 ), as well as our estimates using SNPs (global H e = 0.097 for NL and H e = 0.102 for OL). Notwithstanding the weaknesses of the SNPs for the assessment of genetic diversity, we cannot discard inbreeding to explain the deficit of heterozygotes observed in the present work as has been stated in the brook charr Salvenilus fontinalis ( Castric et al, 2002 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It is also the first study to detect evidence of local adaptation with loci under selection (OL). Levels of overall genetic diversity observed in the localities using the NL and OL datasets ( H O = 0.073 and H O = 0.061, respectively, Table 1 ) were lower than the reported for other TEP marine organisms using microsatellite data ( García-De León et al, 2018 ; Reguera-Rouzaud et al, 2021 ), but they are comparable with values obtained using genomic data. This is the case of the genus Jasus ( J. cavereorum H O = 0.012 and J. paulensis H O = 0.087) ( Silva et al, 2021 ), Symphodus tinca , S. ocellatus ( Torrado et al, 2020 ), and for the freshwater species Esox lucius ( Sunde et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations