2021
DOI: 10.1002/mde.3314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of income diversification in credit unions: Do size, resource, liquidity, and environment matter?

Abstract: This paper investigates income diversification in credit unions in Ghana. We make use of the random effect, Hausman–Taylor, and fractional regression to assess income diversification. We find empirical support that there exist differences between workplace credit union income diversification and other types of credit union. We also find that within nonfinancial income, size, liquidity, loan portfolio, net worth, and economic growth are important. For within liquid financial investment diversification, size, li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for both fixed and random effect on the moderation shows the relationship between income diversification and financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya as presented in table IV. The study adopted fixed effects results that records bank size, age, loan portfolio quality and market share which were significant and positive to bank performance while financial lending strategy had negative effects but significant( ρ<0.05 ).The control variables confirms the existing relationship with depended variables as documented on previous studies .Bank size shows a positive (β=0.241, ρ<0.05) relationship with profitability to imply that bank with more assets tend to be profitable since having more assets reduces its administrative costs hence saving on cost (Cerasi & Daltung, 2000 ;Brighi,& Venturelli,2014;Amoah, et al,2021). Bank age shows a positive (β=0.304, ρ<0.05) relationship with profitability, as the bank grows over the years they tend to break, stabilize their operations, manage risk and increase customer base resulting profitability (Lin et al, 2014).This findings is contrary to Talavera et al (2018) who argued that bank age diversity have had negative impact on performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results for both fixed and random effect on the moderation shows the relationship between income diversification and financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya as presented in table IV. The study adopted fixed effects results that records bank size, age, loan portfolio quality and market share which were significant and positive to bank performance while financial lending strategy had negative effects but significant( ρ<0.05 ).The control variables confirms the existing relationship with depended variables as documented on previous studies .Bank size shows a positive (β=0.241, ρ<0.05) relationship with profitability to imply that bank with more assets tend to be profitable since having more assets reduces its administrative costs hence saving on cost (Cerasi & Daltung, 2000 ;Brighi,& Venturelli,2014;Amoah, et al,2021). Bank age shows a positive (β=0.304, ρ<0.05) relationship with profitability, as the bank grows over the years they tend to break, stabilize their operations, manage risk and increase customer base resulting profitability (Lin et al, 2014).This findings is contrary to Talavera et al (2018) who argued that bank age diversity have had negative impact on performance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Fabozzi, et al (2002) documented the legacy of the theory by enumerating achievement on asset management and portfolio selection. In the previous studies that has confirmed the positive significant effects of income diversification on financial performances grounding their studies on this theory include; Chung et al (2013) Amoah et al (2021) and Mwangi( 2017).Equally the theory of financial intermediation posit that the indivisibilities of bank asset structure implies that the diversification increases the bank size that influences financial performance in the long run. (Diamond, 1984;Cerasi & Daltung, 2000).…”
Section: Literature Review Theortical Literaturementioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several researchers have shown that income diversification carried out by banks can increase bank stability (Ashraf et al, 2016;Ghenimi et al, 2017;Hunjra et al, 2020;Moudud-Ul-Huq, 2019;Sissy et al, 2017;Wang & Lin, 2021). Meanwhile, other researchers show that there is no (irrelevant) effect of income diversification on bank stability (Abuzayed et al, 2018;Amoah et al, 2021;Ozili, 2018;Paltrinieri et al, 2020) even in some conditions, income diversification can reduce bank stability due to increased agency costs in banks ( Edirisuriya et al, 2015;Stiroh, 2004;Tran et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%