Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BACKGROUND Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death in the U.S. oil and gas extraction industry, resulting in approximately thirty worker fatalities every year. Many oil and gas extraction companies have developed comprehensive motor vehicle safety programs; some have described the impact of those programs at industry conferences, in industry magazines, or in trade journals. The purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of the motor vehicle safety initiatives that have been published in this industry. This paper will summarize the reported effectiveness of these initiatives, identify the research gaps in the literature, and describe recommendations to enhance future motor vehicle safety research in the oil and gas extraction industry. METHODS To be included in this review, articles had to meet the following criteria: 1) available in an online database; 2) published during 1990-2012; 3) describe a motor vehicle safety initiative within an oil and gas extraction company; and 4) objectively measure the effectiveness of at least one component of a motor vehicle safety initiative. RESULTS The authors identified 38 articles that met the criteria above. Oil and gas extraction companies have employed a variety of interventions to improve motor vehicle safety among their workforce; the most common found in this review were in-vehicle monitoring, journey management, driver training and qualification, and driver fitness and alertness. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to improve the quality of research articles examining motor vehicle safety in the oil and gas extraction industry. The authors’ systematic review found a limited number of published articles describing motor vehicle safety initiatives in the oil and gas extraction industry, particularly in the U.S. In addition, the articles often suffered from a weak study design and did not evaluate the long-term impact of their initiatives over time. There is a continued need for oil and gas extraction companies to evaluate the impact of their motor vehicle safety initiatives and publish their findings in peer-reviewed journals to enhance the dissemination of effective strategies.
BACKGROUND Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death in the U.S. oil and gas extraction industry, resulting in approximately thirty worker fatalities every year. Many oil and gas extraction companies have developed comprehensive motor vehicle safety programs; some have described the impact of those programs at industry conferences, in industry magazines, or in trade journals. The purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of the motor vehicle safety initiatives that have been published in this industry. This paper will summarize the reported effectiveness of these initiatives, identify the research gaps in the literature, and describe recommendations to enhance future motor vehicle safety research in the oil and gas extraction industry. METHODS To be included in this review, articles had to meet the following criteria: 1) available in an online database; 2) published during 1990-2012; 3) describe a motor vehicle safety initiative within an oil and gas extraction company; and 4) objectively measure the effectiveness of at least one component of a motor vehicle safety initiative. RESULTS The authors identified 38 articles that met the criteria above. Oil and gas extraction companies have employed a variety of interventions to improve motor vehicle safety among their workforce; the most common found in this review were in-vehicle monitoring, journey management, driver training and qualification, and driver fitness and alertness. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to improve the quality of research articles examining motor vehicle safety in the oil and gas extraction industry. The authors’ systematic review found a limited number of published articles describing motor vehicle safety initiatives in the oil and gas extraction industry, particularly in the U.S. In addition, the articles often suffered from a weak study design and did not evaluate the long-term impact of their initiatives over time. There is a continued need for oil and gas extraction companies to evaluate the impact of their motor vehicle safety initiatives and publish their findings in peer-reviewed journals to enhance the dissemination of effective strategies.
As safety programs in the oil and gas industry evolve, many companies are realizing they have reached a plateau in their ability to effectively reduce lost time injury rates. Past progress in reducing rates was made primarily by introducing new tools and equipment that made the work place safer. The advent of safety management systems, which provide a structured approach to how companies address safety, brought about the next significant reduction in injury rates. Even with these significant advancements in safety programs, injuries related to stepping, handling and lifting still account for more than 70% of all injuries recorded in the oilfield service industry. Realizing this, one major oilfield service company, with more than 80,000 employees, is addressing the problem with a systematic approach rather than with individual programs. This paper shows how the service company's eight-element management system model has been applied to reduce injuries related to stepping, handling and lifting. This systematic approach is built upon training modules designed to educate employees on how to reduce and eliminate the hazards they encounter on a daily basis. By introducing significant change in how injury prevention is addressed at all levels of the organization, the company is effectively moving to the next level in safety management. Practical details of the initiatives undertaken in each element of the management system are given, along with progress to date. The paper concludes by describing how this management system approach affects the company, including strengthening the 24/7 safety culture that was created when this same approach was applied in 1998 to reduce driving risks. Introduction Over the past several years, as safety programs in the oil and gas industry have evolved, many companies recognized that they have reached a plateau in their ability to effectively reduce lost time injury rates. Significant progress was made in the past by introducing new tools and equipment that made the work place safer. In addition, the introduction of safety management systems, which provided a structured approach to how companies address safety, brought about the next significant drop in injury rates. The Schlumberger Injury Prevention Program (SIPP) takes safety to the next level. This program, built upon training modules designed to educate employees on how to reduce and eliminate the hazards they encounter on a daily basis, is not just another training program. By introducing significant organizational change in how injury prevention is addressed at all levels of the company, this program is effectively taking Schlumberger to the next level in safety. Although a risk profile of reported hazards (Fig. 1) indicates that only 35% of reported risks relate to stepping, handling and lifting issues ("Personnel" segment of chart), actual injuries related to stepping, handling and lifting currently account for more than 70% of all serious injuries suffered by Schlumberger employees (Fig. 2). Although there have been initiatives in the past to address this, none have had a significant impact on reducing these injuries. SIPP was developed to address the everyday risks that the Schlumberger workforce sees each time they go to the wellsite. As such, each business segment can modify the program to address the specific risks their employees are facing. SIPP is the first global effort of its kind within Schlumberger, extending to all Schlumberger companies, in all segments, and in all geographical areas.
Schlumberger health, safety, and environment (HSE) programs have evolved over the past 20 years, accompanied by a steady decline in accident rates. However, in 2003 and 2004, improvement in accident rates had reached a plateau, and analysis indicated that more than 50% of accidents involved a failure to follow established, documented procedures. The need for a program to address behavior enforcement and behavior change was evident, and in 2004, the company formed a task force of employees and consultants to define such a program. This paper describes that program and its development, including definitions of its three components: accountability, hazard analysis and risk control, and observation and intervention. Also discussed are the must-have elements, changes in new-employee training, initial reaction to the program, and results to date. Introduction Schlumberger HSE programs have evolved over the past 20 years, beginning with learning the regulatory requirements, on-the-job training, and the traditional posters. Next came the no-blame culture, which stressed pre-event reporting, event analysis, and structured auditing programs. In 1998, the Schlumberger HSE reporting system evolved from monthly on-line statistics reporting into a sophisticated real-time event-reporting and record-keeping system that supports consistent classification and investigation of incidents and development of remedial action plans. At the same time came QUEST, the Schlumberger system for creating and recording HSE events in a single database. QUEST permitted better and faster analysis of events, including root causes and management of corrective actions. Throughout this evolution in HSE programs, there was a steady reduction in accident rates (Figure 1). However, during 2003 and 2004, Schlumberger recognized a slowdown in the rate of improvement in company-wide accident rates. Further analysis of safety events showed one recurring root cause in more than 50% of accidents: nonconformance to established safety standards and procedures. These two factors, coupled with the increase in the company's global business activity and the increasing proportion of new employees meant that the company had to do something different or accept the existing level of accident rates, or even a reversal of accident-rate trends.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.