2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00203-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving and riding avoidance following motor vehicle crashes in a non-clinical sample: psychometric properties of a new measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
4
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
42
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As described above, the DRAS (Stewart & St. Peter, 2004) assesses avoidance behaviour for various driving and riding situations. The measure consists of 20 situations which are rated for frequency of avoidance over the past week on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (avoid rarely or none of the time) to 3 (avoid most or all of the time).…”
Section: Driving and Riding Avoidance Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As described above, the DRAS (Stewart & St. Peter, 2004) assesses avoidance behaviour for various driving and riding situations. The measure consists of 20 situations which are rated for frequency of avoidance over the past week on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (avoid rarely or none of the time) to 3 (avoid most or all of the time).…”
Section: Driving and Riding Avoidance Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are subscale scores for general avoidance (items 1-3, 12, 18-20), avoidance of traffic and busy roads (items 5-10, 15), avoidance of weather or darkness (items 11-14, 17), and riding avoidance (items 4, 13-16). As noted earlier, the DRAS was developed and its psychometric properties investigated in a series of studies using different samples of undergraduate students who were crash survivors (Stewart & St. Peter, 2004).…”
Section: Driving and Riding Avoidance Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variants of the DBQ have been widely employed in numerous other studies (Åberg & Rimmö, 1998;Blockey & Hartley, 1995;Lajunen et al, 2004). EFA has also been applied for studying phenomena such as decision-making style and driving style (e.g., French et al, 1993), driver aggression and anger (Hauber, 1980;Iversen & Rundmo 2002, driver stress (Gulian et al, 1989), driver fatigue (Matthews & Desmond, 1997), perceptual motor skills and safety skills , skills and safetymotives (Lajunen & Summala, 1995), problem driving (Hartos et al, 2000), driver vengeance (Wiesenthal et al, 2000), driver emotion (Mesken, 2006), avoidance of driving (Stewart & St. Peter, 2004), and attitudes and habits towards speeding (De Pelsmacker & Janssens, 2005). The majority of EFA studies appear to be primarily based on self-reports of driving without incorporating objective driving performance.…”
Section: The Use Of Factor Analysis For Extracting Driver Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other instruments that are focused on behavior, such as the Inquiry behavior [8] and the Driving and Riding Scale Prevention [9], the DCQ focuses on cognition and, with this, can provide relevant information about driving fears.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%