2022
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2022-378
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving mechanisms for the ENSO impact on stratospheric ozone

Abstract: Abstract. While the impact of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on the stratospheric circulation has been long recognized, its effects on stratospheric ozone have been less investigated. In particular, the impact on ozone of different ENSO flavors, Eastern Pacific (EP) El Niño and Central Pacific (CP) El Niño, as well as the driving mechanisms for the ozone variations have not been investigated to date. This study aims to explore these open questions by examining the anomalies in advective transport, mixing … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively large ensemble of WACCM time-slice simulations cleanly demonstrates which aspects of stratospheric transport are most important to ENSO-driven STT of ozone. Previous studies have highlighted that ENSO modulates the deep branch of the BDC on seasonal timescales via changes in the residual circulation and quasi-horizontal mixing (e.g., Calvo et al, 2010;Neu et al, 2014;Diallo et al, 2019;Benito-Barca et al, 2022), a result that is supported here (Figs. 1-3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The relatively large ensemble of WACCM time-slice simulations cleanly demonstrates which aspects of stratospheric transport are most important to ENSO-driven STT of ozone. Previous studies have highlighted that ENSO modulates the deep branch of the BDC on seasonal timescales via changes in the residual circulation and quasi-horizontal mixing (e.g., Calvo et al, 2010;Neu et al, 2014;Diallo et al, 2019;Benito-Barca et al, 2022), a result that is supported here (Figs. 1-3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%