2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2190469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drop formation and breakup of low viscosity elastic fluids: Effects of molecular weight and concentration

Abstract: The dynamics of drop formation and pinch-off have been investigated for a series of low viscosity elastic fluids possessing similar shear viscosities, but differing substantially in elastic properties. On initial approach to the pinch region, the viscoelastic fluids all exhibit the same global necking behavior that is observed for a Newtonian fluid of equivalent shear viscosity. For these low viscosity dilute polymer solutions, inertial and capillary forces form the dominant balance in this potential flow regi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

45
385
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 376 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
45
385
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the relaxation time of a polymer solution may significantly deviate from its Zimm relaxation time because of polymer-polymer interactions unless the polymer solution is very dilute, and this deviation is particularly relevant in extensional flows [44][45][46] . However, the relaxation times of polymer solutions, which were measured under shear flows, slowly increased until c reaches c* (refs 45,46), which was also observed by single DNA experiments 47 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the relaxation time of a polymer solution may significantly deviate from its Zimm relaxation time because of polymer-polymer interactions unless the polymer solution is very dilute, and this deviation is particularly relevant in extensional flows [44][45][46] . However, the relaxation times of polymer solutions, which were measured under shear flows, slowly increased until c reaches c* (refs 45,46), which was also observed by single DNA experiments 47 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale bar denotes the length of 100 mm. 44 , where c is a polymer concentration and [m] is estimated to be 0.77/c* (ref. 48).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the focusing efficiencies for M w = 0.3×10 6 g/mol are much lower than those of M w = 0.6×10 6 g/mol for all the investigated c. The solutions with M w = 0.3×10 6 g/mol results in the weak elasticity, whose λ is over 4 times shorter than that for M w = 0.6×10 6 g/mol at the same c ( λ ∝ 2.1 w M ). 29,30 5 Therefore, a good carrier solution should have weak shear thinning and sufficient elasticity at the same time. In the present study, the PEO solution of M w = 0.6×10 6 g/mol is the optimal one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,11] The enhanced extensional viscosity (or elasticity) of polymer solutions is believed to cause the larger drop size. [12] Increases in other rheological properties such as dynamic surface tension, [3,13] and to a lesser extent static surface tension and zero shear rate viscosity have also been reported to increase spray drop size. [14][15][16] There currently exist an extensive range of commercial drift control adjuvants (DCAs), a selection of which is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%