2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10544-020-00513-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Droplet size prediction in a microfluidic flow focusing device using an adaptive network based fuzzy inference system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between both results could possibly be caused by a number of factors that were ignored in the system model, including the compliance in the PDMS microfluidic device, fluid leakage, temperature variations, and fabrication errors. The results in Figure 5 a,b were also found to be in agreement with those reported in [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 29 ].…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between both results could possibly be caused by a number of factors that were ignored in the system model, including the compliance in the PDMS microfluidic device, fluid leakage, temperature variations, and fabrication errors. The results in Figure 5 a,b were also found to be in agreement with those reported in [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 29 ].…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, these studies were not validated. Mottaghi et al mixed artificial neural networks and fuzzy inference systems, to study the parameters that affect the droplet size, numerically and experimentally [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 A similar work was conducted by Mottaghi et al, who studied the effect of four dimensionless parameters, Ca, Re, flow rate ratio, and viscosity ratio, on the droplet size. 86 In addition, other parameters, including cross-junction tilt angles, flow rates, and surfactant concentration, can also be correlated to the droplet size, and multiple droplet properties other than droplet sizes, such as generation frequency and flow regime, can be accurately predicted. [87][88][89] 90,91 To further increase the model training efficiency, Siemenn et al designed a Bayesian optimization and computer vision feedback loop to quickly discover the control parameters.…”
Section: Prediction Of Droplet Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Lopez [10], the performance of the LZ model was evaluated by R 2 , R 2 -adjusted, and R 2 -predicted. R 2 values' range is from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates that the model does not describe the process, and 1 shows that all data are on the regression line [21]. The adjusted R 2 is a variant of R 2 that has been adjusted for the number of forecasters in the model.…”
Section: Da Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micromachines 2021, 12, 1164 2 of 14 Currently, there is no ANN-based model for the prediction of LZ; however, this technique was previously used successfully in the prediction of silver nanoparticles [19,20], droplet size in microfluidic devices [21], or the identification of operating parameters in microfluidic devices [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%