2001
DOI: 10.1078/s0176-1617(04)70141-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drought-adaptive mechanisms involved in the escape/tolerance strategies of Arabidopsis Landsberg erecta and Columbia ecotypes and their F1 reciprocal progeny

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
28
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Dry weights were assayed to study the growth performance of the plants during the drought stress period. As previously shown in the work of Meyre et al (2001), we observed a difference in drought stress tolerance between the accessions Ler and Col-0. Col-0 plants acclimate to drought by increasing their root-to-shoot ratio and increasing their water use efficiency, while Ler plants exhibit more of a drought-escape strategy by flowering early and reallocating nutrients from the rosette to the flowers, which leads to a rapid yellowing of rosette leaves.…”
Section: Attre1-overexpressing Lines Are More Tolerant To Severe Drousupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Dry weights were assayed to study the growth performance of the plants during the drought stress period. As previously shown in the work of Meyre et al (2001), we observed a difference in drought stress tolerance between the accessions Ler and Col-0. Col-0 plants acclimate to drought by increasing their root-to-shoot ratio and increasing their water use efficiency, while Ler plants exhibit more of a drought-escape strategy by flowering early and reallocating nutrients from the rosette to the flowers, which leads to a rapid yellowing of rosette leaves.…”
Section: Attre1-overexpressing Lines Are More Tolerant To Severe Drousupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Our work indicates that Col has a greater ability to modify root system morphology in response to osmotic signals than Ler. This is consistent with a study of drought response in Col and Ler, where Col was found to alter development to withstand drought, whereas Ler exhibited drought escape strategies such as early flowering (Meyre et al 2001). Col and Ler provide an interesting system to study the potential benefits or disadvantages of having a small and plastic root system vs. a large root system that is less sensitive to osmotic signals.…”
Section: Colsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…There are numbers of factors which play crucial roles when a plant encounters drought such as plant species and variety, duration and intensity of water deficit,environmental conditions, alterations in water demand from the atmosphere and plant growth as well (Chaves et al, 2002).The result of this study showed that both vte 4 mutant and wild type A.thaliana plants recorded the highest value under control condition consider in gmorphological traits such as rosette dry weight, specific leaf area, rosette dry weight at bolting and root mass fraction in comparison with other water regimes. This result was in accordance with previous study which indicated the fact that by providing the appropriate water availability to the plant, the growth parameters obtained the higher value compared to stress environment (Meyre et al, 2001). In A.thaliana the biomass can be considered by weighing the plant rosette dry weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In A.thaliana the biomass can be considered by weighing the plant rosette dry weight. Therefore, Wild type and vte 4 mutant Arabidopsis thaliana responses to different water... the reduction of rosette dry weight and rosette dry weight at bolting under water deficit resulted in biomass decrease (Meyre et al, 2001). In this study the specific leaf area, rosette dry weight and rosette dry weight at bolting were reduced as the frequency of water deficit escalated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation