2021
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.692208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Symptomatic Intracranial High-Grade Stenosis: A Review of the Current Rationale

Abstract: Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD) remains a challenging disorder in the neurovascular field. Despite best medical treatment, the recurrence rate for stroke remains high in patients with intracranial high-grade stenosis (>70–99%). Furthermore, two large randomized trials (SAMMPRIS and VISSIT) failed to prove the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in patients with sICAD. Drug-coated balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (DCB-PTA) represents an alt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 46 , 47 ] with promising results and was only revisited in 2018 [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. However, despite good results and reviews continuing to advocate for the evaluation of DCB in the treatment and prevention of ECAS and ICAS in in-stent restenosis [ 57 , 58 , 59 ] and restenosis, data addressing the use of DCB and the evaluation of its possible benefits in the neurovascular setting remain rare; consequently, we believe that this field is under-investigated, and publications are lacking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 46 , 47 ] with promising results and was only revisited in 2018 [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. However, despite good results and reviews continuing to advocate for the evaluation of DCB in the treatment and prevention of ECAS and ICAS in in-stent restenosis [ 57 , 58 , 59 ] and restenosis, data addressing the use of DCB and the evaluation of its possible benefits in the neurovascular setting remain rare; consequently, we believe that this field is under-investigated, and publications are lacking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for using a single-arm trial design was that there is currently a lack of industry evaluation standards for the safety and effectiveness of intracranial DCB; however, intracranial DCB therapy is a relatively mature treatment method. 15 , 16 In addition, the inclusion standard of diseased arteries in this study was set at ​≥ ​l mm, and there are no other proven safe and effective products to serve as controls; as such, we decided to use the single-arm, target-value method for evaluation. Based on previous literature reports addressing intracranial drug balloons and clinical experience, we estimated the restenosis rate within 6 months and ultimately decided to include 155 subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%