2019
DOI: 10.1101/512244
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug combination sensitivity scoring facilitates the discovery of synergistic and efficacious drug combinations in cancer

Abstract: High-throughput drug sensitivity screening has been utilized for facilitating the discovery of drug combinations in cancer. Many existing studies adopted a dose-response matrix design, aiming for the characterization of drug combination sensitivity and synergy. However, there is lack of consensus on the definition of sensitivity and synergy, leading to the use of different mathematical models that do not necessarily agree with each other. We proposed a cross design to enable a more cost-effective testing of se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synergy scores were estimated using four different methods (ZIP, Loewe, HSA, and Bliss) and both the cobicistat/nirmatrelvir and the ritonavir/nirmatrelvir combinations displayed similar, pan-variant, synergism (Figure 6, Figure S4) which was more evident in the highest range of the tested concentrations (5-20µM) of cobicistat and ritonavir (Figure S4). The potency of each drug combination was then analyzed by calculating combination sensitivity scores (CSS), as previously described (Malyutina et al, 2019). Of note, cobicistat/nirmatrelvir showed a significantly higher combination sensitivity score than ritonavir/nirmatrelvir (Figure 6), suggesting enhanced suppression of SARS-CoV-2 replication across the range of concentrations tested, and in line with the increased potency of single treatment with cobicistat (i.e.…”
Section: Higher Sars-cov-2 Inhibition Through Nirmatrelvir/cobicistat...mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Synergy scores were estimated using four different methods (ZIP, Loewe, HSA, and Bliss) and both the cobicistat/nirmatrelvir and the ritonavir/nirmatrelvir combinations displayed similar, pan-variant, synergism (Figure 6, Figure S4) which was more evident in the highest range of the tested concentrations (5-20µM) of cobicistat and ritonavir (Figure S4). The potency of each drug combination was then analyzed by calculating combination sensitivity scores (CSS), as previously described (Malyutina et al, 2019). Of note, cobicistat/nirmatrelvir showed a significantly higher combination sensitivity score than ritonavir/nirmatrelvir (Figure 6), suggesting enhanced suppression of SARS-CoV-2 replication across the range of concentrations tested, and in line with the increased potency of single treatment with cobicistat (i.e.…”
Section: Higher Sars-cov-2 Inhibition Through Nirmatrelvir/cobicistat...mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Drug interaction scores were evaluated using the web tool SynergyFinder plus (Zheng et al, 2022). Parameters analyzed included synergy (ZIP, Loewe, HSA, and Bliss models) and combination sensitivity (Malyutina et al, 2019). The relationship between maximal inhibition values and baseline infection was assessed by Spearman correlation, while pairwise comparisons were analyzed by paired t-test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations