1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-6757(96)90147-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in the ED: Analysis of a high-risk population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
155
2
19

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
11
155
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been estimated that patients taking two drugs face a 13% risk of drug interactions, rising to 38% when taking four drugs, and to 82% if seven or more drugs are given simultaneously (Goldberg et al, 1996). Furthermore, prescription of potentially inappropriate medications to older people is highly prevalent in the United States and Europe, and inappropriate prescribing is associated with increased risk for adverse drug events (Gallagher, Barry, O'Mahony, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been estimated that patients taking two drugs face a 13% risk of drug interactions, rising to 38% when taking four drugs, and to 82% if seven or more drugs are given simultaneously (Goldberg et al, 1996). Furthermore, prescription of potentially inappropriate medications to older people is highly prevalent in the United States and Europe, and inappropriate prescribing is associated with increased risk for adverse drug events (Gallagher, Barry, O'Mahony, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the probability of an adverse drug event is 13% in patients taking 2 drugs, and increases to 82% in those taking more than seven concluded by study of Goldberg et al, (1996). 14 In patients taking 10 medications or more, this probability nears 100% concluded by study of Nolan and O'Malley (1988). 15 ( Fig.2) …”
Section: Fig 1: Age Distribution Of Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The most recent comparison found programs that identified all of ten important potential interactions, or as few as five of ten. 5 In a similar study using a program called Drug Master Plus, Goldberg et al 23 found an almost threefold higher incidence of potential drug-drug interactions (47% vs 17%) in a county and community hospital population. They also found a higher number of potential interactions per patient (2.5 vs. 1.1) than the current study.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 These have identified high-risk groups, such as elders [21][22][23] and those taking multiple medications. 22,23 Underlying these studies is the assumption that the computer does a better job than the physician, but to the best of our knowledge, this has never been systematically assessed. Furthermore, while potential drug-drug interactions have been studied, we believe the incidence of potential interactions between drugs and ethanol or laboratory tests have not been quantified.…”
Section: Langdorf Et Al • Drug Interactions In the Edmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation