2021
DOI: 10.1111/liv.14985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug‐induced liver injury at a tertiary care centre in Germany: Model for end‐stage liver disease is the best predictor of outcome

Abstract: Background & Aims Agents most frequently inducing idiosyncratic drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) differ between countries worldwide. Besides, there is no consistent data on the best model predicting mortality or the need for liver transplantation in DILI. We here analysed the DILI cohort of our centre with regard to causative drugs and clinical outcome. Methods A retrospective analysis of 157 consecutive severe DILI patients presenting to our tertiary care centre in Hamburg, Germany, from 2008 to 2018, was per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the studies cover several aspects related to the safety implications of dipyrone therapy, a didactic division has been made to group the issues in the discussion: dipyrone in children [22][23][24][25][26][27], dipyrone during pregnancy [28], dipyrone and blood dyscrasias [29][30][31][32][33][34], dipyrone in specific diseases [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], in addition to anaphylactic reactions and general adverse effects of dipyrone [45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. About the quality of the studies, it is worth mentioning the scarcity of clinical trials, with the majority being of observational retrospective or cohort design (n = 27).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the studies cover several aspects related to the safety implications of dipyrone therapy, a didactic division has been made to group the issues in the discussion: dipyrone in children [22][23][24][25][26][27], dipyrone during pregnancy [28], dipyrone and blood dyscrasias [29][30][31][32][33][34], dipyrone in specific diseases [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], in addition to anaphylactic reactions and general adverse effects of dipyrone [45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. About the quality of the studies, it is worth mentioning the scarcity of clinical trials, with the majority being of observational retrospective or cohort design (n = 27).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary hospital in Germany, the development of DILI was associated with the use of methimazole in 23 of 154 patients evaluated (14.9%), with two patients requiring liver transplantation [38]. In another cohort of 157 patients, dipyrone was the second drug causing DILI, behind only phenprocoumon, an oral anticoagulant (n = 17 and 21, respectively) [39]. Thus, even if it is relatively low overall frequency, dipyrone-induced DILI is something that should be taken into consideration by healthcare systems.…”
Section: Dipyrone In Specific Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA), and rarely other autoantibodies that might be detected in the serum of patients treated with conventional drugs who experienced liver injury assessed for causality by RUCAM [ 117 , 118 ]. For instance, among a cohort of 139 RUCAM-based iDILI patients, serum ANA results were positive in 95 patients (68.3%) and negative in 44 patients (32.7%), but data remain open for discussion since cases with a possible causality grading were included, herbal and dietary supplements were among the DILI patients, and the original RUCAM was used lacking exclusion of HEV rather than the updated RUCAM [ 117 ]. In 71% of these cases, ANA and/or SMA titers were positive.…”
Section: Progress Of Molecular and Mechanistic Immune Mechanisms In I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA), and rarely other autoantibodies that might be detected in the serum of patients treated with conventional drugs, who experienced liver injury addressed for causality using RUCAM [60,61]. For instance, among a cohort of 139 RUCAM based iDILI patients, serum ANA results were positive in 95 patients (68.3%) and negative in 44 patients (32.7%), but data remain open for discussion since cases with a possible causality grading were included, herbal and dietary supplements were among the DILI patients, and the original RUCAM was used lacking exclusion of HEV rather than the updated RUCAM [60]. In 71% of these cases ANA and/or SMA titers were positive.…”
Section: Serum Autoantibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%