2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-015-0231-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual–Authority Thrust–Vectoring of a Tri–TiltRotor employing Model Predictive Control

Abstract: This paper addresses the exploitation of the combined potential of the directly-actuated and the underactuated control authorities of unmanned aerial vehicles with thrust-vectoring actuation. For the modeling, control synthesis and experimental evaluation a custom developed unmanned tri-tiltrotor is employed, equipped with rotor-tilting mechanisms which enable the direct actuation of its longitudinal dynamics, while retaining the standard body-pitching underactuated authority. An explicit model predictive cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work on the control synthesis is closely related to previous work of Darivianakis et al (2014) and Papachristos et al (2016) that has been successfully implemented on similar multirotor platforms and Oettershagen et al (2014), (2016) that has been deployed on fixed wing platforms.…”
Section: Landing Target Trackingmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our work on the control synthesis is closely related to previous work of Darivianakis et al (2014) and Papachristos et al (2016) that has been successfully implemented on similar multirotor platforms and Oettershagen et al (2014), (2016) that has been deployed on fixed wing platforms.…”
Section: Landing Target Trackingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, Mueller and D’Andrea () presented a nonlinear controller which can stabilize an MAV despite the loss of one, two, or three propellers and demonstrate the significance of using the MAV model in the control synthesis. Regarding linear model‐predictive control, we consider the work of Papachristos, Alexis, and Tzes (), Darivianakis, Alexis, Burri, and Siegwart (), and Oettershagen, Melzer, Leutenegger, Alexis, and Siegwart, () to be the most related one with our control synthesis. They show that a predictive controller can successfully be used for a variety of complex and practical applications (e.g., physical interaction between MAV and the environment) and can easily be implemented in several platforms from quadcopters, tiltrotors to fixed wing aircraft.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is designed to use a minimum combination of motors and elevons to control the system within its whole flight envelope. Therefore, the proposed design does not require additional hardware for the transition maneuver, as opposed to other design concepts such as tilt rotors [9]- [12]. This allows maintaining a low cost, low complexity system.…”
Section: System Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A learning-based MPC controller is proposed in [12]; the quadratic programming solver is running on an onboard computer including an Intel Atom processor. The authors of [13] apply robust MPC to UAVs using a multi-parametric approach; The control law is computed explicitly and evaluated onboard on a computer with an Intel Atom processor.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%