2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2019)134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual conformal invariance for form factors

Abstract: Form factors of the stress-tensor multiplet operator in N = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills reveal surprisingly simple structures similar to those appearing in scattering amplitudes. In this paper we show that, as for the case of amplitudes, they also enjoy dual conformal symmetry. We compute the dual conformal anomaly at one loop for an arbitrary number of particles and generic helicities, which matches the expression of the dual conformal anomaly of amplitudes, and perform explicit checks for MHV and NMHV one-lo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Form factors of a variety of operators have been calculated in N = 4 sYM theory using modern techniques originally developed in the context of scattering amplitudes. These include recursion relations [14][15][16][17], on-shell diagrams, polytopes and Graßmannians [18][19][20][21][22][23], twistor space actions [24][25][26][27], a connected prescription [28][29][30], color-kinematics duality [31][32][33], and a dual description via the AdS/CFT correspondence [14,[34][35][36][37][38]. These results are currently limited to two loops for n ≥ 3.…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)147mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Form factors of a variety of operators have been calculated in N = 4 sYM theory using modern techniques originally developed in the context of scattering amplitudes. These include recursion relations [14][15][16][17], on-shell diagrams, polytopes and Graßmannians [18][19][20][21][22][23], twistor space actions [24][25][26][27], a connected prescription [28][29][30], color-kinematics duality [31][32][33], and a dual description via the AdS/CFT correspondence [14,[34][35][36][37][38]. These results are currently limited to two loops for n ≥ 3.…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)147mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FFOPE is based on the dual description of the form factor in terms of a periodic Wilson loop [14,34,35,37,38]. Similar to scattering amplitudes, this dual Wilson loop is defined via dual points x i , where x i+1 − x i = p i .…”
Section: Near-collinear Limit Via Integrabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the ∼ sign indicates that the identity holds up to an appropriate shift by some integer multiple of a period. It is important to rewrite the results introduced so far in terms of region variables for the purpose of establishing recursion relations at loop level discussed in this paper, and to associate to each diagram a well defined behaviour under dual conformal transformations described in detail in the companion paper [46]. In terms of region variables, one can rewrite (3.6) and (3.9) as…”
Section: Overview Of Nmhv Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However q is not light-like, hence the argument of[48] does not apply here. Actually we will show in the companion paper[46] that the full dual conformal symmetry is preserved by form factor diagrams.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Modern amplitude techniques were applied to form factors of TrF 2 , which compute the leading contribution to Higgs þ multigluon amplitudes in the effective Lagrangian approach, including MHV diagrams [31,32] at tree level [33,34] and one loop [35], and a combination of one-loop MHV diagrams and recursion relations [36]. Recent work [37][38][39][40][41] addressed the computation of the four-dimensional cut-constructible part of Higgs+multi-gluon scattering from operators of mass dimension seven using generalized unitarity [42,43] applied to form factors [39,40,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. The key point of this work is that we extend dimensional reconstruction to any form factor of operators involving vector fields, which requires the subtraction of form factors of an appropriate class of scalar operators that we identify.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%