2019
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Convolutional Neural Networks With Attention Mechanisms Based Method for Predicting Disease-Related lncRNA Genes

Abstract: A lot of studies indicated that aberrant expression of long non-coding RNA genes (lncRNAs) is closely related to human diseases. Identifying disease-related lncRNAs (disease lncRNAs) is critical for understanding the pathogenesis and etiology of diseases. Most of the previous methods focus on prioritizing the potential disease lncRNAs based on shallow learning methods. The methods fail to extract the deep and complex feature representations of lncRNA-disease associations. Furthermore, nearly all the methods ig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To show the prediction ability of the RFLDA, we compare it with several excellent LDA prediction models, such as SIMCLDA [33], Ping's method [18], MFLDA [31], LDAP [39], CNNLDA [44], and GCNLDA [45]. The AUCs and AUPRs of all LDA prediction models are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Other Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To show the prediction ability of the RFLDA, we compare it with several excellent LDA prediction models, such as SIMCLDA [33], Ping's method [18], MFLDA [31], LDAP [39], CNNLDA [44], and GCNLDA [45]. The AUCs and AUPRs of all LDA prediction models are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Other Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison results indicate that the RFLDA has excellent ability of LDA prediction. It should be noted that the AUCs and AUPRs of other six models except RFLDA in Table 1 are derived from Xuan et al's work [44,45].…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Other Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations