2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.01.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Part-pooling Attentive Networks for Session-based Recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al [26] proposed a global context-enhanced graph neural network model (GCE-GNN), which uses global graph and session graph to learn the global context information and local context information of the current session, respectively. Zhang et al [27] proposed a dual part-pooling attentive networks for session-based recommendation (DPAN4Rec), which applies sequential acquisition and collective acquisition to capture sequential dependencies and collective dependencies in sessions, respectively. Choi et al [28] proposed session-aware linear item similarity/transition model (SLIST) for considering the holistic aspects of the sessions.…”
Section: Collaborative Information-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang et al [26] proposed a global context-enhanced graph neural network model (GCE-GNN), which uses global graph and session graph to learn the global context information and local context information of the current session, respectively. Zhang et al [27] proposed a dual part-pooling attentive networks for session-based recommendation (DPAN4Rec), which applies sequential acquisition and collective acquisition to capture sequential dependencies and collective dependencies in sessions, respectively. Choi et al [28] proposed session-aware linear item similarity/transition model (SLIST) for considering the holistic aspects of the sessions.…”
Section: Collaborative Information-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the effectiveness of SR-GTM, we compare it with the following baselines: item-KNN [4], FPMC [21], GRU4REC [3], NARM [10], STAMP [11], SR-GNN [12], DPAN4Rec [27], SLIST [28], NISER+ [30], CSRM [15], and STAN [16].…”
Section: Baseline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of recurrent neural networks, Hidasi et al (2015) proposed GRU4REC, which uses GRU to process and model the time features of a session sequence. Zhang et al (2021) stack GRU as an encoder to extract information and then aggregate it as a session embedding through partial pooling of attention layers. However, sequential/session-based recommendations based on the recurrent neural network can only capture the user's time interest features.…”
Section: Session-based Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention mechanism is incorporated into the neural network to distinguish the importance of different items within a session. Co-CoRec [21] leverages category information to capture the context-aware action dependence and uses a selfattention network to capture item-to-item transition patterns within each category-specific subsequence. DPAN [22] applies an attention network to model both the collective and sequential information within sessions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%