2019
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2018.2879573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Polarization FBMC for Improved Performance in Wireless Communication Systems

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…hence the temporal symbol interval is T0 = 512/10 7 = 51.2 µs. As mentioned in [13], the mean RMS-DS values for pedestrian and vehicular A channels are 46 and 370 ns, respectively. For channel models we chose pedestrian and vehicular channels A from ITU-R recommendation M.1225 [10].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…hence the temporal symbol interval is T0 = 512/10 7 = 51.2 µs. As mentioned in [13], the mean RMS-DS values for pedestrian and vehicular A channels are 46 and 370 ns, respectively. For channel models we chose pedestrian and vehicular channels A from ITU-R recommendation M.1225 [10].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In our simulations following the approach in [13] we evaluate BER performance in two multipath fading channels. We compare PAPR, and the effects of carrier time and frequency offsets.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DP-FBMC Structure I has similar computational complexity and requires the same equipment and space as conventional FBMC. In [1] via simulation results we showed that in practical cross-polarization discrimination (XPD) conditions in different channel environments the proposed DP-FBMC has similar bit error ratio (BER) performance comparing to conventional FBMC and CP-OFDM, and in highly frequency-selective channels it has better BER performance than FBMC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The difference in these methods is the location of offset-QAM (OQAM) modulated symbols in the time, frequency, and polarization domains. As described in [1], for DP-FBMC Structure I we separate the adjacent modulated and filtered OQAM symbols on two orthogonal polarizations by multiplexing symbols in time domain. By this approach we can remove the intrinsic interference that results from (temporally) adjacent symbols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%