The dual-detector, neutron-porosity tool used on Leg 104 (Norwegian Sea) of the Ocean Drilling Program indicated erroneously high porosities in the basalt flows encountered in Hole 642E. A qualitative theoretical analysis of the response of this tool suggests that the discrepancy could be caused by the relatively large thermal neutron-absorption cross section of basalt. This analysis also indicates that, given the proper cross-section data, a calibration or redesign of this type of tool for use in igneous rocks should be straightforward.