Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program 1989
DOI: 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.104.194.1989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Neutron-Porosity Log Uncertainties: Ocean Drilling Program Hole 642E

Abstract: The dual-detector, neutron-porosity tool used on Leg 104 (Norwegian Sea) of the Ocean Drilling Program indicated erroneously high porosities in the basalt flows encountered in Hole 642E. A qualitative theoretical analysis of the response of this tool suggests that the discrepancy could be caused by the relatively large thermal neutron-absorption cross section of basalt. This analysis also indicates that, given the proper cross-section data, a calibration or redesign of this type of tool for use in igneous rock… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above corrections partly accounted for the 12% difference observed by Lysne [1989] 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13. The estimated increase in • is too low to yield a significant increase in the thermal porosity.…”
Section: Porosity Correctionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above corrections partly accounted for the 12% difference observed by Lysne [1989] 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13. The estimated increase in • is too low to yield a significant increase in the thermal porosity.…”
Section: Porosity Correctionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…of boron, the absorption effect reaches its peak around 15% (about 4%) and then decreases as porosity increases to 30%. In basaltic rocks, the presence of strong neutron absorbers has been recently proposed by some authors [Broglia and Moos, 1988;Lysne, 1989;Moos, 1989] to explain the discrepancies between log and core porosity measurements in fresh, unfractured massive basalts. The selection of such intervals for the log-core calibration is based on the assumption that, in spite of the different volume investigated, due to the absence of fracturing and alteration, both logs and cores should provide the same porosity measurement (i.e.…”
Section: Porosity Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clay-free sediments saturated with water this interaction depends mainly on hydrogen atoms in pore fluids. In igneous and metamorphic rocks, the formation -tool response can be influenced by the presence of hydrous minerals (particularly secondary phases), neutron absorbers such as chlorine or gadolinium in the rock or the pore fluid/drilling mud (e.g., seawater), and the higher matrix density of the rocks [e.g., Lysne, 1989;Broglia and Ellis, 1990;Harvey and Brewer, 2005]. Although sophisticated logging tools minimize for some of these effects and provide neutron porosity values closer to porosities measured on core samples, neutron porosity values still overestimate porosity in the upper oceanic crust.…”
Section: Comparison Between Physical Properties From Core Samples Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ODP neutron porosity logs consistently overestimate the porosity of basalts [ Anderson et al , 1985; Broglia and Moos , 1988; Lysne , 1989; Moos , 1990]. Broglia and Ellis [1990] utilized logs from five sites to analyze the relative contributions of several factors to this systematic bias.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%