2020
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2019.2947562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Stage Soft Failure Detection and Identification for Low-Margin Elastic Optical Network by Exploiting Digital Spectrum Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of knowledge about network topology for efficient failure detection and localization is emphasized in [16]. Failure detection and localization in optical networks is hot-topic area because these networks usually represent backbone and core of service provider communication network infrastructure [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Two types of failures can be observed, hard and soft failures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The importance of knowledge about network topology for efficient failure detection and localization is emphasized in [16]. Failure detection and localization in optical networks is hot-topic area because these networks usually represent backbone and core of service provider communication network infrastructure [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Two types of failures can be observed, hard and soft failures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of failures can be observed, hard and soft failures. Hard failures represent complete malfunction of the device or link (for example, fiber cut), while the soft failures represent the degradation of performance (for example, component aging) [17]. Hard failures impact the network performance immediately and are easier to detect.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed in [2], several studies have demonstrated the potential of ML and data analytics in leveraging field data to automate ONFM and effectively perform Quality of Transmis-sion (QoT) monitoring [3], failure detection [4,5], failure-cause identification [6,7], failure localization [8][9][10][11] and failure prediction [12]. Most ML-based ONFM approaches rely on supervised learning techniques and on monitoring of signal-quality data, e.g., Optical Signal-to-Noise Ratio (OSNR) and/or Bit Error Rate (BER), made available by modern coherent receivers or by Optical Spectrum Analysers (OSAs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, ML has been demonstrated to accurately recognize such failure signatures under specific assumptions (e.g., a single lightpath, a certain number of spans in an optical transmission system, etc.) [4,6]. However, a main limitation to practical ML deployments for ONFM comes from the fact that, in real network scenarios, availability of historical failure data can be scarce for several reasons (e.g., lack of monitoring equipment at every network node, high cost of acquisition of large datasets, high resilience of optical transmission systems, which makes failures occurrence rare phenomena, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%