2006
DOI: 10.15554/pcij.05012006.66.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ductile Connections in Precast Concrete Moment Resisting Frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance of reduced scaled and full scaled dry and wet precast exterior beam column connections were evaluated by conducting experiments under reversed cyclic loading (Vidjeapriya & Jaya, 2012Ertas et al 2006;Joshi et al, 2005). Different means for precast beam column connections were adopted such as connection using dowel bar, dowel bar with cleat angles, cleat angles with single stiffener and double stiffener, tie rod and steel plates, use of cast in place concrete in beam and column, composite connection with welding, bolted connections etc.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of reduced scaled and full scaled dry and wet precast exterior beam column connections were evaluated by conducting experiments under reversed cyclic loading (Vidjeapriya & Jaya, 2012Ertas et al 2006;Joshi et al, 2005). Different means for precast beam column connections were adopted such as connection using dowel bar, dowel bar with cleat angles, cleat angles with single stiffener and double stiffener, tie rod and steel plates, use of cast in place concrete in beam and column, composite connection with welding, bolted connections etc.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies on post-tensioned connections showed that increase in mild reinforcement ratio results in improved ductility and energy dissipation capacities. However, in some cases premature buckling and rupture of mild reinforcement may occur before reaching the drift ratios that the connection can sustain (Cheok et al 1993;Priestley et al 1999;ACI T1.2 2003;Ertas et al 2006). It is proposed that, unbonding of reinforcing bars over a length of precast beam and column elements in a sleeve can reduce the strain demands and prevent rupture which leads significant degradation in strength (Cheok et al 1996;Pampanin et al 2001;Belleri et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are a limited number of experimental studies on the behavior of hybrid (emulativewelded) connections in the literature. Ertas et al (2006) tested half-scaled one exterior beam-column connection where the first diagonal crack near the connection was reported at 2.2% drift ratio and the beam bottom rebars ruptured at the first cycle of 3.5% drift ratio. Yuksel et al (2015) tested five half-scaled exterior hybrid connections including a slab which are subjected to monotonic and cyclic drifts applied at the beam tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Senel and Kayhan [10] conducted a case study to explore precast building fragility based on damage assessment using non-linear time history analysis. Ertas et al [11] carried out a series of tests. In these tests, many models were developed and investigated using cast-in-place concrete in the beamcolumn connection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%