2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability of adhesive bonds to tooth structure involving the DEJ

Abstract: The importance of the Dentin Enamel Junction (DEJ) to the durability of adhesive bonds to tooth structure is unclear. In fact, no investigation has been reported on contributions of the DEJ to the fatigue resistance of the bonded interface. In this study, the durability of adhesive bonds to tooth structure involving the DEJ was quantified and compared to that of adhesive bonds to enamel only, not including the DEJ. Two different configurations of enamel bonding were considered, including when tensile stress is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the composite treatment that immediately followed SDF application required an etching step and multiple coats of dental composite on the affected surface and the effectiveness of the initial SDF treatment after the composite coverage was not reported. Furthermore, it is known that composite restorations in the oral cavity have a high rate of failure due to cracks and gaps creating spaces for bacterial infiltration causing further decay [ 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 ]. With the selective and targeted anchoring peptide, AgBP2, one potential improvement to previous studies would be to include our peptide within the adhesive to help reinforce interfacial binding between the SDF-treated dental surface and composite restoration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the composite treatment that immediately followed SDF application required an etching step and multiple coats of dental composite on the affected surface and the effectiveness of the initial SDF treatment after the composite coverage was not reported. Furthermore, it is known that composite restorations in the oral cavity have a high rate of failure due to cracks and gaps creating spaces for bacterial infiltration causing further decay [ 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 ]. With the selective and targeted anchoring peptide, AgBP2, one potential improvement to previous studies would be to include our peptide within the adhesive to help reinforce interfacial binding between the SDF-treated dental surface and composite restoration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the mechanical properties of this zone are difficult to describe within the currently accepted limitations of the model. The enamel–dentine bond in terms of its mechanics represents the natural bonding of the enamel and dentin to allow for joint deformation to occur [ 45 , 46 ]. In a numerical model, the joint deformation of two media with different mechanical properties is realised by a joint finite element mesh, according to the “node-to-node” principle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides mechanical and biological properties, a durable bond between restoration and the luting material is a crucial factor for a sufficient clinical long-term stability. The adhesion of composite material to tooth structure has already been extensively clarified and documented [ 8 , 9 ]. In general, composite resin materials consist of a resin matrix of polymerized methacrylate, inorganic fillers, and (photo-)initiators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%