2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability of ambient cured alumina silicate concrete based on slag/fly ash blends against sulfate environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This behaviour of the FA/GBFS 80/20 concrete, which was not appreciable in samples with 100% FA (Valencia-Saavedra, Mejia de Gutiérrez and Gordillo, 2018), can be attributed to the presence of the blast furnace slag, a material that provides calcium to the system, generating hydrated calcium silicate gel as reaction product, in addition to the aluminosilicate gels proper to the alkaline activation of fly ash (C-A-S-H/N-A-S-H). This performance agrees with those reported by other authors (Manjunatha et al, 2014;Gopalakrishnan and Chinnaraju, 2019;Nath and Kumar, 2014). At 7 and 28 days for FA/GBFS concretes (80/20) designed with 400 kg/m 3 of precursor, Nath and Kumar (2014) reported compressive strength values similar to those obtained in the present study, although the proportions of activator and the characteristics of fly ash were different.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This behaviour of the FA/GBFS 80/20 concrete, which was not appreciable in samples with 100% FA (Valencia-Saavedra, Mejia de Gutiérrez and Gordillo, 2018), can be attributed to the presence of the blast furnace slag, a material that provides calcium to the system, generating hydrated calcium silicate gel as reaction product, in addition to the aluminosilicate gels proper to the alkaline activation of fly ash (C-A-S-H/N-A-S-H). This performance agrees with those reported by other authors (Manjunatha et al, 2014;Gopalakrishnan and Chinnaraju, 2019;Nath and Kumar, 2014). At 7 and 28 days for FA/GBFS concretes (80/20) designed with 400 kg/m 3 of precursor, Nath and Kumar (2014) reported compressive strength values similar to those obtained in the present study, although the proportions of activator and the characteristics of fly ash were different.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, physical deterioration and some signs of surface erosion was observed for the control sample immersed in the MgSO 4 solution after 6 months while all other samples showed no change in appearance In addition, no significant changes were observed in the weight of the samples after immersion in both solutions (not shown). those reported in [13,49], which found that the exposure to MgSO 4 caused more deterioration than to Na 2 SO 4 . Therefore, they concluded that the process of sulphate attack on NS-activated slag/fly ash binders strongly depends on the cation accompanying the sulphate.…”
Section: 3sulphate Resistancementioning
confidence: 69%
“…Recently, Gopalakrishnan and Chinnaraju [13] studied the sulphate resistance of silicateactivated slag/fly ash. They concluded that in sulphate environment AASF concrete with 40% fly ash performs well among all the mixes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was commonly concluded that the higher percentage of fly ash and slag within concrete decreases the durability and mechanical properties. This was also shown with a decrease of resistance when exposed to high temperatures [148][149][150][151].…”
Section: Fly Ash and Slag In Concretementioning
confidence: 62%