2018
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1716984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durable Remissions with Ivosidenib inIDH1-Mutated Relapsed or Refractory AML

Abstract: In patients with advanced IDH1-mutated relapsed or refractory AML, ivosidenib at a dose of 500 mg daily was associated with a low frequency of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events and with transfusion independence, durable remissions, and molecular remissions in some patients with complete remission. (Funded by Agios Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02074839 .).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
1,068
1
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,205 publications
(1,102 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
23
1,068
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific driver genetic mutations occur in different subtypes of AML, and therapies targeting mutations in AML have emerged: midostaurin (Stone et al , ) in combination with induction chemotherapy for upfront treatment and gilteritinib monotherapy (Perl et al , ) for relapsed or refractory disease in AML with FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 ( FLT3 ) mutations; and ivosidenib (DiNardo et al , ) and enasidenib (Stein et al , ) for relapsed or refractory AML with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 ( IDH1 and IDH2 ) mutations. Strategies targeting other genetic mutations and their activated cellular pathways are urgently needed (Lam et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific driver genetic mutations occur in different subtypes of AML, and therapies targeting mutations in AML have emerged: midostaurin (Stone et al , ) in combination with induction chemotherapy for upfront treatment and gilteritinib monotherapy (Perl et al , ) for relapsed or refractory disease in AML with FMS‐like tyrosine kinase 3 ( FLT3 ) mutations; and ivosidenib (DiNardo et al , ) and enasidenib (Stein et al , ) for relapsed or refractory AML with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 ( IDH1 and IDH2 ) mutations. Strategies targeting other genetic mutations and their activated cellular pathways are urgently needed (Lam et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…163,164 Enasidenib was approved in August 2017 for the treatment of IDH2mutated, refractory-relapsed AML. Enasidenib, an IDH2 inhibitor, and ivosidenib, an IDH1 inhibitor, were developed as targeted therapies for these subgroups.…”
Section: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (And High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among patients with refractory-relapsed AML, both agents produced bone marrow CR rates of 30% to 40% and a median survival of 8 to 9 months. 163,164 Enasidenib was approved in August 2017 for the treatment of IDH2mutated, refractory-relapsed AML. Ivosidenib was approved in July 2018 soon for the treatment of IDH1mutated, refractory-relapsed AML.…”
Section: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (And High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately, 35%‐43% of patients have also demonstrated transfusion independence, including those with non‐CR/CRi responses . For responding patients, molecular MRD eradication rates of 35% and 23% for enasidenib (12/35 CR) and ivosidenib (7/31 CR or CR with partial hematologic recovery [CRh]), respectively, have been reported, suggesting the potential for marked suppression of IDH mutant clones in some patients . Response to IDH inhibitors appears greater among patients with fewer concomitant mutations, which may explain the trend for higher response rates when patients are treated at earlier stages of disease.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Relapsed and Refractory (R/r) Amlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both enasidenib (approved August 1, 2017) 108 respectively, have been reported, suggesting the potential for marked suppression of IDH mutant clones in some patients. 48,109 Response to IDH inhibitors appears greater among patients with fewer concomitant mutations, which may explain the trend for higher response rates when patients are treated at earlier stages of disease. Interestingly, late relapses have been reported in association with rising 2-HG and noncatalytic second site mutations located at the homodimer interface.…”
Section: Idh1/2 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%