2012
DOI: 10.1002/jae.2263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration Dependence Versus Unobserved Heterogeneity in Treatment Effects: Swedish Labor Market Training and the Transition Rate to Employment

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a second step we investigate the subsequent employment stability of program participants and nonparticipants by introducing a third transition process similar to van den Berg and Vikström (2014). In addition, we estimate models allowing for a random treatment effect following Richardson and van den Berg (2013) and models with two treatments (JCSs and training), whereby we allow the probability of entering one treatment to depend on the participation in another treatment. None of these model extensions leads to different results.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a second step we investigate the subsequent employment stability of program participants and nonparticipants by introducing a third transition process similar to van den Berg and Vikström (2014). In addition, we estimate models allowing for a random treatment effect following Richardson and van den Berg (2013) and models with two treatments (JCSs and training), whereby we allow the probability of entering one treatment to depend on the participation in another treatment. None of these model extensions leads to different results.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We additionally allow for a random coefficient for the treatment effect similar to Richardson and van den Berg (2013). In this model, we allow both treatment effects to vary with respect to unobserved heterogeneity.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In labor economics literature, Abbring et al (2005), Arni et al (2013) and Van Ours (2004) for example, use similar methods. Other examples are Fevang et al (2014) who analyze Norwegian absenteeism jointly modeling the flow from presence to absence and back and Richardson and van den Berg (2013) who study the effect of labor market training on the job finding rates of Swedish unemployed workers. 5 Note that the expectation about the effect of past use on opinions is not very clear.…”
Section: Cannabis Policy In the Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persons that took part in professional activation programmes have shorter duration of unemployment [Bieszk-Stolorz and Markowicz 2015a, data: Local Labour Office in Koszalin, 2011, Kaplan-Meier estimator, uncontinuous regression model], however the reverse phenomenon was observed for women in Korea [Lee and Lee 2005]. Positive effects were observed after 12 months from registration [Richardson and van den Berg 2013]. Some authors obtained results confirming that the ratio of persons deregistered because of getting work diminishes when the unemployment duration increases [Rotaru 2014;Daras and Jerzak 2005;Long 2009].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%