2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00007.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration of antibiotics in children with osteomyelitis and septic arthritis

Abstract: Contrary to expectations and local protocols, most patients were treated with conventional long-duration therapy. Patients treated for short courses had good outcomes. The low rate of complications may make randomized controlled equivalence trials unfeasible. Increasing evidence of the efficacy and safety of short-duration treatment (3-3.5 weeks) for acute, uncomplicated OM or SA in children suggests that this could be accepted as the standard treatment. However, this should be evaluated prospectively using a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
3
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
37
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since no prospective, sufficiently powered, randomised trials were available, treatment was based on animal studies [68], expert opinions and the rationale that bone revascularisation after debridement lasts 4 weeks [65]. For years, treatment of AHOM stagnated under the belief that medication should last for 4-6 weeks [2,3,[62][63][64][65][66][67], including an i.v.…”
Section: Duration Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since no prospective, sufficiently powered, randomised trials were available, treatment was based on animal studies [68], expert opinions and the rationale that bone revascularisation after debridement lasts 4 weeks [65]. For years, treatment of AHOM stagnated under the belief that medication should last for 4-6 weeks [2,3,[62][63][64][65][66][67], including an i.v.…”
Section: Duration Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[3][4][5][6]8 A detailed description of the search is shown in Fig 1. The studies included in this review are listed in Table 1 and the details of the treatment, bacteriology, antibiotics used, and outcomes are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three were prospective, 3,5,8 2 were retrospective chart reviews, 4,6 and 1 was a retrospective database study. 1 The studies also varied greatly in regard to sample size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations