Abstract:A considerable proportion of patients with renal transplant, evaluated many years after transplant, lack protective diphtheria antibody levels, despite primary immunization, but maintain immunity to tetanus. These patients respond to a diphtheria and tetanus booster but the duration of the response is uncertain. This study was undertaken to assess if protective antibodies evoked by primary immunization are lost quickly after transplantation, and whether the extent of the immune response to a booster influences… Show more
“…Booster vaccination for both diphtheria and tetanus was effective and safe in pediatric renal transplant recipients who had received their primary immunization before transplant (34). However, titers to diphtheria declined rapidly in the first 12 months after transplant, confirming what has been found in younger patients (81). This led to the recommendation in patients after renal transplantation to routinely administer tetanus and diphtheria boosters at regular intervals and assess postvaccination titers every 5 years for tetanus and not later than 2 years after vaccination for diphtheria.…”
Recipients of solid-organ transplantation are at risk of severe infections due to their life-long immunosuppression. Despite emerging evidence that vaccinations are safe and effective among immunosuppressed patients, most vaccines are still underutilized in these patients. The efficacy, safety, and protocols of several vaccines in this patient population are poorly understood. Timing of vaccination appears to be critical because response to vaccinations is decreased in patients with end-stage organ disease and in the first 6 months after transplantation. For these reasons, the primary immunizations should be given before transplantation, as early as possible during the course of disease. Vaccination strategy should include vaccination of household contacts and health care workers at transplant centers unless contraindicated. No conclusive data are available on the use of immunoadjuvants and screening for protective titers. Most vaccines appear to be safe in solid-organ transplantation recipients, but live vaccines should be avoided until further studies are available. The risk of rejection appears minimal. Recommended vaccines include pneumovax, hepatitis A and B, influenza, and tetanus-diphtheria. We outline specific protocols and recommendations in this particular patient population. Specific contraindications exist for other vaccines, such as yellow fever, oral polio vaccine, bacillus Calmette-Guerin, and vaccinia. We conclude that solid-organ recipients will benefit from consistent immunization practices. Further studies are recommended to improve established protocols in this patient population
“…Booster vaccination for both diphtheria and tetanus was effective and safe in pediatric renal transplant recipients who had received their primary immunization before transplant (34). However, titers to diphtheria declined rapidly in the first 12 months after transplant, confirming what has been found in younger patients (81). This led to the recommendation in patients after renal transplantation to routinely administer tetanus and diphtheria boosters at regular intervals and assess postvaccination titers every 5 years for tetanus and not later than 2 years after vaccination for diphtheria.…”
Recipients of solid-organ transplantation are at risk of severe infections due to their life-long immunosuppression. Despite emerging evidence that vaccinations are safe and effective among immunosuppressed patients, most vaccines are still underutilized in these patients. The efficacy, safety, and protocols of several vaccines in this patient population are poorly understood. Timing of vaccination appears to be critical because response to vaccinations is decreased in patients with end-stage organ disease and in the first 6 months after transplantation. For these reasons, the primary immunizations should be given before transplantation, as early as possible during the course of disease. Vaccination strategy should include vaccination of household contacts and health care workers at transplant centers unless contraindicated. No conclusive data are available on the use of immunoadjuvants and screening for protective titers. Most vaccines appear to be safe in solid-organ transplantation recipients, but live vaccines should be avoided until further studies are available. The risk of rejection appears minimal. Recommended vaccines include pneumovax, hepatitis A and B, influenza, and tetanus-diphtheria. We outline specific protocols and recommendations in this particular patient population. Specific contraindications exist for other vaccines, such as yellow fever, oral polio vaccine, bacillus Calmette-Guerin, and vaccinia. We conclude that solid-organ recipients will benefit from consistent immunization practices. Further studies are recommended to improve established protocols in this patient population
“…This problem could be overcome in some patients by repeated vaccinations (with increasing dose) [27,45]. Secondly, vaccine serum antibodies in children with CRF have a tendency to wane over a short period of time, i.e., 6-12 months [27,41,42,45,51,52,54,56]. Therefore, repeated measurement of serum antibodies with appropriate revaccination has been recommended [17,27,45,51,54].…”
Section: Immunogenicitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The majority of previous reports focused on the safety and short-term immunogenicity [28,29,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55], whereas data on the long-term clinical efficacy are rare [21,27,56].…”
Section: The Risk Of Vaccine-preventable Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Killed or component vaccines have not shown any deleterious effect on renal function in children on conservative treatment or after RTPL; in particular, there was no evidence of an increased rate of graft rejection and the efficacy of dialysis was not affected in children on either peritoneal or hemodialysis [27,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55].…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also, administration of boosters after RTPL induced a significant antibody response: diphtheria [39,41] and tetanus [39,41].…”
The prevention of systemic viral and bacterial infections by effective vaccination represents an essential task of pediatric nephrologists caring for children with chronic renal failure (CRF) undergoing renal transplantation (RTPL) with life-long immunosuppression. This review addresses three issues: risk of vaccine-preventable diseases, safety, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy of available vaccines, and implementation of immunization guidelines. Infections (including vaccine-preventable infections) represent the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children on dialysis and after RTPL. Vaccination in children with CRF and after RTPL is safe and does not cause reactivation of an immune-related renal disease or rejection after RTPL. Children with CRF generally produce protective serum antibodies to primary vaccinations with killed or component vaccines and live virus vaccines; some children on dialysis and after RTPL may not respond optimally, requiring repeated vaccination. Proof of vaccine efficacy is absence of disease, which can only be confirmed in large cohort studies. A few observational studies provide evidence that vaccination has contributed significantly, at least in the western hemisphere, to the low prevalence of vaccine-preventable diseases among children with CRF. Close cooperation between the local pediatrician/practitioner and the pediatric nephrologist is essential for successful implementation of the vaccination schedule.
These data show a low percentage of patients with positive vaccination titres pre-transplant, a low revaccination rate post-transplant with limited antibody response, and a high rate of vaccination titre losses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.