1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002130050525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol in mice

Abstract: Behavioral sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of some drugs can be quite persistent, lasting for weeks to months after cessation of drug exposure. We investigated the duration of sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of 2.0 g/kg ethanol (EtOH) and determined whether repeated EtOH administration would lead to alterations in blood EtOH clearance rates. Female mice were injected (IP) daily for up to 10 consecutive days with saline or EtOH. Baseline activity and acute EtOH locomotor resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect increased progressively across the sessions and ended up reaching a plateau, indicating that our protocol led to the development of a ceiling effect on the locomotor stimulation produced by repeated ethanol administration. The sensitized response to ethanol was also evident when mice were tested following an abstinence period of 7 days, suggesting, as previously reported (Lessov and Phillips, 1998), persistent neural changes induced by ethanol. Interestingly, it has been postulated that such persistence could be associated with potentially permanent adaptations in neural pathways important for the motivational properties of drugs of abuse (Kalivas et al, 1993;Robinson and Berridge, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This effect increased progressively across the sessions and ended up reaching a plateau, indicating that our protocol led to the development of a ceiling effect on the locomotor stimulation produced by repeated ethanol administration. The sensitized response to ethanol was also evident when mice were tested following an abstinence period of 7 days, suggesting, as previously reported (Lessov and Phillips, 1998), persistent neural changes induced by ethanol. Interestingly, it has been postulated that such persistence could be associated with potentially permanent adaptations in neural pathways important for the motivational properties of drugs of abuse (Kalivas et al, 1993;Robinson and Berridge, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Lessov and Phillips (1998) undertook similar experiments and concluded that ethanol sensitization in mice persists for up to 23 days although there was some disagreement among individual experiments within the larger study; whereas one experiment suggested that ethanolinduced locomotor sensitization lasted for at least 23 days, another suggested that it may dissipate by day 17. In a more recent study Fish et al (2002) demonstrated continued ethanol sensitization persisting out to post-sensitization day 58.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we were interested in only a limited number of group comparisons, we recognized that Statistica would perform Newman-Keuls post-hoc tests for every possible comparison following the significant interaction of treatment and day. Because this approach would unnecessarily restrict alpha to an ever greater extent with the inclusion of each additional induction day (in an effort to control family-wise error), an priori decision was made to separately compare each of the daily activity scores of the RE-RS-E group to its own activity scores on days 2 or 3, each of the daily activity scores of the RS-RE-E group to its own activity scores on day 3, and each of the experimental groups (RE-RS-E and RS-RE-E) to the control group (RS-RS-E) on each induction day (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). When the locomotor activity of the RE-RS-E mice was compared using this approach they exhibited a significant acute locomotor stimulant effect on day 3 (compared to day 2, p < 0.01; compared to the RS-RS-E control group on the same day, p < 0.05), as well as an enhancement of this effect when compared to the activity scores of the RS-RS-E controls on days 3 and 5-13 (p's < 0.05).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2;2005a). These are not unlike procedures most conducive to the induction of the psychomotor activating effects of alcohol, where repeated and spaced injections of alcohol (i.e., intermittent schedules of alcohol exposures), induce stronger psychomotor activating effects than in controls provided with massed exposures to alcohol (Pecins- Thompson and Peris, 1993;Lessov and Phillips, 1998;Quadros et al, 2003). Similarly, other abused drugs induce psychomotor activation effects (Robinson, 1984;Wise and Bozarth, 1987;Wise and Rompre, 1989) that are exaggerated by repeated and spaced exposures to the drug, relative to controls receiving fewer but massed exposure to similar amounts of the drug (Salamone, 1992;Stewart, 2003).…”
Section: Psychomotor Sensitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%