1997
DOI: 10.1029/97je00965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration of tessera deformation on Venus

Abstract: The density and distribution of impact craters superposed on the highly deformed tessera terrain on Venus permit analysis of the amount and duration of deformation prior to the emplacement of the stratigraphically younger global volcanic plains. Eighty percent of tesserae craters are undefonned. No existing craters exhibit evidence of contractional deformation, suggesting that the early compressional stage of tessera deformation ended abruptly. The small number of craters fractured by late-stage tessera extens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later work by Gilmore et al (1997), which concluded that the average surface age of tessera was about 1.4 T, con®rmed this estimate. The di cult part of the tessera age estimate, besides the fact that the morphologically rough and radar bright surface of this terrain camou¯ages smaller craters from identi®cation (see Basilevsky et al, 1997a;Gilmore et al, 1997 for details), is the large error bars and the problem of boundary craters.…”
Section: Tesseramentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Later work by Gilmore et al (1997), which concluded that the average surface age of tessera was about 1.4 T, con®rmed this estimate. The di cult part of the tessera age estimate, besides the fact that the morphologically rough and radar bright surface of this terrain camou¯ages smaller craters from identi®cation (see Basilevsky et al, 1997a;Gilmore et al, 1997 for details), is the large error bars and the problem of boundary craters.…”
Section: Tesseramentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Later work by Gilmore et al (1997), which concluded that the average surface age of tessera was about 1.4 T, con®rmed this estimate. The di cult part of the tessera age estimate, besides the fact that the morphologically rough and radar bright surface of this terrain camou¯ages smaller craters from identi®cation (see Basilevsky et al, 1997a;Gilmore et al, 1997 for details), is the large error bars and the problem of boundary craters. The ®rst is due to the relatively small number of on-tessera craters which, in turn, is a result of the relatively small percentage of the surface of Venus occupied by tessera, about 8% according to Ivanov and Head (1996), and the previously mentioned rather small total number of impact craters on the planet.…”
Section: Tesseramentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because none of about 80 craters observed on tessera show evidence of early tessera-forming compressional deformation, and only seven craters are overprinted by later tessera-forming tensional deformation, one may conclude that the tesseraforming deformation ceased within a relatively short time period: less than 1/80 of the tessera age (about 0.01T) for the compressional stage and within about 7/80 of the tessera age (about 0.1-0.2T) for the tensional stage [Gilmore et al, 1997]. This also has two implications: (1) that the termination of the compressional stage of tessera-forming deformation was the starting point of the accumulation of the on-tessera crater population, and (2) that during the subsequent tensional phase of tessera formation, craters were mostly mildly deformed and not completely wiped out.…”
Section: Absolute Age Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%