2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-01189-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durvalumab compared to maintenance chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: the randomized phase II SAFIR02-BREAST IMMUNO trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, neoadjuvant chemotherapy including taxanes has better therapeutic effect and easier access to neoadjuvant chemotherapy pCR. The literature [4] randomized 316 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy into the CEF or DE (docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 , epirubicin 60 mg/m 2) chemotherapy regimen group. The study found that the overall response rate of the DE group is better than that of the FEC group in patients with early tumors (stage I-IIa).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, neoadjuvant chemotherapy including taxanes has better therapeutic effect and easier access to neoadjuvant chemotherapy pCR. The literature [4] randomized 316 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy into the CEF or DE (docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 , epirubicin 60 mg/m 2) chemotherapy regimen group. The study found that the overall response rate of the DE group is better than that of the FEC group in patients with early tumors (stage I-IIa).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination increased pCR rate, particularly in patients pretreated with durvalumab monotherapy before chemotherapy. Another randomized phase II study, SAFIRO BREAST-IMMUNO, compared durvalumab to maintenance chemotherapy in a cohort including TNBC patients [ 324 ]. Results showed that durvalumab, as a single agent therapy, could improve outcomes in TNBC patients.…”
Section: New Strategies and Challenges For Breast Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay defined PD-L1 positivity as a combined positive score of ≥1, while in the Ventana PD-L1 IHC SP142 assay, positivity was defined as ≥1 % expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells (Figure 5) (Table A1). The different assays have been specifically implemented in relation to the clinical evidence from trials and validated with specific platforms [177][178][179]. Regardless, in addition to specific companion diagnostics, 22C3 (Dako) and SP263 (Ventana) are antibody clones generally accepted by pharmaceuticals for clinical use.…”
Section: Programmed Cell Death-ligandmentioning
confidence: 99%