2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dust Impact Monitor (SESAME-DIM) measurements at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Abstract: Context. The Rosetta lander Philae successfully landed on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 12 November 2014. Philae carries the Dust Impact Monitor (DIM) on board, which is part of the Surface Electric Sounding and Acoustic Monitoring Experiment (SESAME). DIM employs piezoelectric PZT sensors to detect impacts by submillimeter-and millimeter-sized ice and dust particles that are emitted from the nucleus and transported into the cometary coma. Aims. The DIM sensor measures dynamical data such a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, though considered less likely, one may also interpret the regolith-depleted surface region at Abydos as being due to an enhanced clean-up of the surface layer from granular material driven by recent gas activity. In this respect, it is noteworthy to mention that signs of local activity, for instance dust grains released from the local surface, are not reported from (direction-sensitive) SESAME-DIM dust impact monitor measurements at Abydos [47,48] despite significantly longer measurement times and a very close surface distance with respect to the SESAME dust detection during the lander descent. The comparison of the surface texture of Agilkia and Abydos suggests that different degrees of physical processing have shaped the surface landscape at both sites, with the material at Abydos being more representative of the less processed nucleus surface.…”
Section: (Ii) Abydosmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Alternatively, though considered less likely, one may also interpret the regolith-depleted surface region at Abydos as being due to an enhanced clean-up of the surface layer from granular material driven by recent gas activity. In this respect, it is noteworthy to mention that signs of local activity, for instance dust grains released from the local surface, are not reported from (direction-sensitive) SESAME-DIM dust impact monitor measurements at Abydos [47,48] despite significantly longer measurement times and a very close surface distance with respect to the SESAME dust detection during the lander descent. The comparison of the surface texture of Agilkia and Abydos suggests that different degrees of physical processing have shaped the surface landscape at both sites, with the material at Abydos being more representative of the less processed nucleus surface.…”
Section: (Ii) Abydosmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The approximate 7 h descent and subsequent multiple touchdowns on the comet surface facilitated unprecedented dual-spacecraft magnetic field measurements of the local environment and indicated the nucleus to have no intrinsic magnetic field on length scales more than 1 m [ 22 ]. A single 1 mm dust particle was detected approximately 2.4 km from the surface, with comparisons to laboratory experiments suggesting a bulk density of 250 kg m −3 , probably being a porous conglomerate [ 23 ]. Subsequent detections were hampered by detector obscuration and operation times, although upper limits on millimetric particle flux (1.6 × 10 −9 m −2 sr −1 ) and volume density 10 −11 –10 −12 m −3 on and near the surface have been provided [ 24 ].…”
Section: Pre-landing and First Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Philae descent to the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, the Dust Impact Monitor (DIM) -aboard the Philae lander-recorded the impact of a cometary grain (Krüger et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detected particle produced an impact signal with U m =2.45 mV and T c = 61 µs (Krüger et al 2015). In Krüger et al (2015), it is assumed that this particle had similar mechanical properties as those of a particular aerogel sample (ρ = 0.25 g/cm 3 and Y = 15 M P a) used for calibration purposes, given that, it was possible to match the detected U m and T c values with those U m and T c values produced by the impact of aerogel particles in the laboratory ( (Krüger et al 2015;Flandes 2015). A summary of the properties of the detected particle is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation