2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70084-3_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dyadic Deontic Logic in HOL: Faithful Embedding and Meta-Theoretical Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key feature of LogiKEy is that these pen-and-paper faithfulness studies can be supported and complemented by experimentation and verification. This is illustrated in Figure 1.2 of Benzmüller et al [84], where it is shown that both the standard inference rules and the axioms of the embedded dyadic deontic logic can be proven valid in our approach. For further related experiments and a discussion of the current limitations of the embedding approach, we refer the reader to Benzmüller and Reiche [85] and in particular to §4.5 of Parent and Benzmüller [86], which briefly discusses in this context the distinction between validity on frame structures versus validity on model structures for a frame.…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A key feature of LogiKEy is that these pen-and-paper faithfulness studies can be supported and complemented by experimentation and verification. This is illustrated in Figure 1.2 of Benzmüller et al [84], where it is shown that both the standard inference rules and the axioms of the embedded dyadic deontic logic can be proven valid in our approach. For further related experiments and a discussion of the current limitations of the embedding approach, we refer the reader to Benzmüller and Reiche [85] and in particular to §4.5 of Parent and Benzmüller [86], which briefly discusses in this context the distinction between validity on frame structures versus validity on model structures for a frame.…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…12 In HOL (with Henkin semantics), sets are associated with their characteristic functions. 13 For many logics, our embedding technique allows such faithfulness results, and an example for a non-trivial dyadic deontic logic has been worked out in detail by Benzmüller et al [84]. A key feature of LogiKEy is that these pen-and-paper faithfulness studies can be supported and complemented by experimentation and verification.…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dyadic deontic operator is represented by {$$obl} (short for obligatory). An embedding of the above DDL is studied in [7,5] Note that the name $modal of modal logics and that of its connective names are given by TPTP defined names (starting with a single dollar sign) since it is the first non-classical logic standardized by the TPTP [21,36]. All further logics are LET-specific logic representations that have not (yet) been included in the collection of TPTP curated NCLs; following the TPTP naming convention, their identifiers hence start with two dollar signs (system defined names).…”
Section: Overview Of Supported Nclsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [12,10] implements DDL in Isabelle. I add the Formula of Universal Law as an axiom to their library.…”
Section: Automated Kantian Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of this paper was inspired by and builds on Benzmüller, Parent, and Farjami's foundational work with the LogiKEy framework for machine ethics, which includes their implementation of DDL in Isabelle [10,12]. The LogiKEy project has been used to study metaphysics [11,32], law [56], and ethics [25], but not Kant's categorical imperative.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%