2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.356-360.2874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Analysis of Land Use / Cover Change in Dangshan County

Abstract: The paper,mainly using 3 scenery TM remote sensing images of Landsat satellite and 1 scenery ETM+ remote sensing image, carried out monitoring and analyzing of the land use / cover change of Dangshan County, including Dangshan County from 1987 to 2009 a total of 23 years of land use / cover change features, land-use conversion relations between types, and discussed the main reason for change. This provided the theory and basis for the Dangshan County urban environment change research, the urban planning, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies have used spatial autocorrelation analyses [36], ordinary least squares and geographically weighted regression methods [25], the Spatial Dubin Model [35], and the three-dimensional trend surface [28], etc. The analysis indicates that the factors driving land development intensity in counties primarily comprise population, economy, and industry, which result from various factors [35,[37][38][39][40][53][54][55][56][57]. This result aligns with our findings.…”
Section: Analysis Of Causes Of Changesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier studies have used spatial autocorrelation analyses [36], ordinary least squares and geographically weighted regression methods [25], the Spatial Dubin Model [35], and the three-dimensional trend surface [28], etc. The analysis indicates that the factors driving land development intensity in counties primarily comprise population, economy, and industry, which result from various factors [35,[37][38][39][40][53][54][55][56][57]. This result aligns with our findings.…”
Section: Analysis Of Causes Of Changesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, alterations in land development intensity can be supported by both topography and natural resources [25,48]. Based on the principle of data accessibility, this study combines previous research [35,[37][38][39][40][53][54][55][56][57]…”
Section: Sources Of Datamentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, from 2005 to 2015, the area of grassland and unused land showed a decreasing trend of 43.56 km 2 and 35.97 km 2 , respectively. Water areas showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing, with an increase of 5.92 km 2 in 2005-2010 due to the increase in water conservancy facilities, and a decrease of 1.18 km 2 in 2010-2015, which was a small decrease and an insignificant change [22]. Although the decrease in grassland and unused land and the increase in construction land are in line with the current situation of regional development, the increase in forest land is the result of the effective implementation of projects such as returning farmland to forest land and afforestation in recent years.…”
Section: Overview Of the Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows transformation information to be obtained about the location and change in areas of different land types at two time phases [26], and has been widely used in LUCC analysis [25][26][27][28][29]. In addition, there are two special methods that have become popular, namely the land use dynamic degree model and intensity analysis [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The land use dynamic degree model can be divided into single land use dynamic degree and comprehensive land use dynamic degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The land use dynamic degree model can be divided into single land use dynamic degree and comprehensive land use dynamic degree. These can quantitatively describe the change rate of land use and play an important role in comparing the regional differences in LUCC and in predicting future trends [30][31][32][33][34]. The concept of intensity analysis, first proposed in 2012 [35,36], is from the perspective of system theory, and is based on the transfer matrix of land use area from different periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%