2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis of rotating shafts using the absolute nodal coordinate formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, as it was in Section 4. 3 The second version of the F com with 4 variables is as follows:…”
Section: Enhanced Deformation Gradient Methods -Edgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, as it was in Section 4. 3 The second version of the F com with 4 variables is as follows:…”
Section: Enhanced Deformation Gradient Methods -Edgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next numerical test was an eigenfrequencies analysis, which was used for ANCF beams in multiple works [12,10,7,17,16,3,18] etc. There are multiple reasons for deciding to consider the eigenfrequency analysis.…”
Section: Eigenfrequencies Of the Simply Supported Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shaft flexibility should be taken into account to predict and model drivetrain vibrations, originating from the turbine rotor, the PMSG or the bearings [100]. In order to perform a vibration and modal analysis of the drivetrain, a more advanced higher-order multi-body model is required as shown in [101,102].…”
Section: Structure and Drivetrain Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it allows combining the merits of different modelling techniques eventually leading to a more realistic virtual replica. Computational Fluid Dynamics [69] FEM structural blade model [70][71][72] Large Eddy Simulation (LES) [78][79][80] FEM model of turbine shaft [103] FEM model of the tower and support structure [89,90] Electromagnetic FEM [109][110][111] Dynamic switching models [127][128][129] Conduction and switching loss models [130,131] Transient wide-bandgap component models [132] Full pitch drivetrain models [150][151][152][153] Full yaw drivetrain models [154,155] Blade-Element Momentum [57] Extensions -Tip losses [60,61] -Dynamic stall [62,63] -Blade flexibility [64,65] -Tower and nacelle flow disturbance [66] -Gaussian [82] or Curl [83] wake model Surrogate models [73][74][75] Multi-body drivetrain model [101,102] Multi-body tower and foundation model [84][85][86]<...>…”
Section: Virtual Replicamentioning
confidence: 99%