1987
DOI: 10.1109/mcs.1987.1105386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis of the activley controlled segmented mirror of the W. M. Keck ten-meter telescope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inset shows the principal loop gain, no larger than 0.25 near structural resonances. Illustration of wind modeling process, and typical M1 response to 1 m/s wind, in nm, from [2]. Representative pressure screen (left), mirror response without control (center), and with 1 Hz M1CS control bandwidth (right); focus-mode bandwidth here is 0.1 Hz.…”
Section: Dynamic Performance 41 Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inset shows the principal loop gain, no larger than 0.25 near structural resonances. Illustration of wind modeling process, and typical M1 response to 1 m/s wind, in nm, from [2]. Representative pressure screen (left), mirror response without control (center), and with 1 Hz M1CS control bandwidth (right); focus-mode bandwidth here is 0.1 Hz.…”
Section: Dynamic Performance 41 Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OWL, composed of about 1000 segments, is going to be an astounding 100 meters in diameter, ten times larger and one hundred times more sensitive than the Keck [3] !…”
Section: Telescope Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind-induced primary mirror response for Keck was predicted to be 44 nm rms 11 . While the Keck worst-case wind vibration did not exceed the error budget allocated to it, the worst-case wind vibration of the primary mirror for CELT may require attention.…”
Section: Naturalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resonance of a segment on its support for Keck is roughly 30 Hz, and this of course varies slightly between segments, and varies with orientation of the telescope. The overall structural model for Keck, including both segment dynamics and the mirror cell, has resonances as low as 10 Hz, and the interaction with these mirror cell modes limited the achievable bandwidth at Keck to about 0.5 Hz or less to avoid instability 11 . Because of the difficulty of adding passive damping at the low vibration levels encountered, many of the modes on Keck have an estimated quality factor Q ≈ 100.…”
Section: Bandwidthmentioning
confidence: 99%