2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-018-1445-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic analysis of trade balance behavior in a small open economy: the J-curve phenomenon and the Czech economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the existing literature about J-curve effect in the trade between European Union (EU) countries and their partners is plentiful (e.g., Hacker and Hatemi-J, 2003 ; 2004 ; Bahmani-Oskooee et al., 2006 ; Hsing, 2009 ; Hsing and Sergi, 2009 ; Šimáková and Stavárek, 2013 ; 2014 ; Nusair, 2017 ; Michail, 2018 ; Gürtler, 2018 ; Lucarelli et al., 2018 ), few studies are dedicated for Vietnam. Phan and Jeong (2015) analyzed Vietnam's trade balance with 16 partners by using Fully Modified OLS and Dynamic OLS estimators for the panel data ranging from 1999Q1 to 2012Q4 and reported that exchange rate negatively influenced trade balance and thus no J-curve effect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the existing literature about J-curve effect in the trade between European Union (EU) countries and their partners is plentiful (e.g., Hacker and Hatemi-J, 2003 ; 2004 ; Bahmani-Oskooee et al., 2006 ; Hsing, 2009 ; Hsing and Sergi, 2009 ; Šimáková and Stavárek, 2013 ; 2014 ; Nusair, 2017 ; Michail, 2018 ; Gürtler, 2018 ; Lucarelli et al., 2018 ), few studies are dedicated for Vietnam. Phan and Jeong (2015) analyzed Vietnam's trade balance with 16 partners by using Fully Modified OLS and Dynamic OLS estimators for the panel data ranging from 1999Q1 to 2012Q4 and reported that exchange rate negatively influenced trade balance and thus no J-curve effect.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the bounds test was conducted using the unrestricted model, an important requirement, given a note by Pesaran et al (2001, p. 312) and Gürtler (2019, p. 485) that failure to keep the coefficients of lagged changes unrestricted may result in tests’ suffering from a pre-testing problem. However, the imposition of restrictions after the cointegration test potentially brings more parsimonious and accurate estimates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasingly available data and econometric methodologies, a vast amount of literature emerged where bilateral analysis focuses on a specific country relationship with her major trading partners, covering both developed and developing countries as the country of interest (see, e.g., Bahmani-Oskooee and Hegerty 2010 for a survey). The studies differ in terms of their conclusion about the existence of the J-curve effect and its extent, and no consensus has been reached using the bilateral analysis, still leaving room for the debate of 'aggregation bias' to continue (e.g., Gürtler 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is interesting to find the global perspective allowing for country-specific heterogeneity, combining the experiences of small and large economies, developing and developed economies are often misleading. For individual country context, policy recommendations need to be based on a countryspecific analysis of complex bilateral relations with various trading partners (Gürtler 2019). We aim to bridge this gap in the literature using Bangladesh as a case.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%