Designing Sustainable Technologies, Products and Policies 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66981-6_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Assessment of Nature Based Solutions Through Urban Level LCA

Abstract: Planning Nature Based Solutions (NBS) to address urban challenges requires an approach that embeds the multiple dimensions of NBS to effectively portray their use and impact. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) provides a comprehensive assessment methodology in this regard. This paper discusses the environmental assessment of NBS via LCA using urban metabolism as an overarching approach to model the urban ecosystem. Performing a dynamic assessment with time series data is suggested as a way of identifying hotspots of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Criticisms of environmental impact assessment have highlighted its shortcomings in demonstrably influencing decision processes (Cashmore et al, 2004;Jay et al, 2007) or for considering societal impacts associated with project decisions (Dendena and Corsi, 2015). Başoğlu et al (2018) proposed a life cycle assessment methodology to conduct a dynamic environmental impact assessment of urban nature-based solutions designed to address a variety of urban challenges related to climate-risks, which include various hazards such as urban heat islands, pollution, and flooding. Larrey-Lassalle et al (2022) reviewed 130 studies that use life cycle assessment methodologies to assess nature-based solutions implemented for a variety of reasons, demonstrating the applicability of these methods to NI systems.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criticisms of environmental impact assessment have highlighted its shortcomings in demonstrably influencing decision processes (Cashmore et al, 2004;Jay et al, 2007) or for considering societal impacts associated with project decisions (Dendena and Corsi, 2015). Başoğlu et al (2018) proposed a life cycle assessment methodology to conduct a dynamic environmental impact assessment of urban nature-based solutions designed to address a variety of urban challenges related to climate-risks, which include various hazards such as urban heat islands, pollution, and flooding. Larrey-Lassalle et al (2022) reviewed 130 studies that use life cycle assessment methodologies to assess nature-based solutions implemented for a variety of reasons, demonstrating the applicability of these methods to NI systems.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some review analyses have already been published; however, because NBS is a very broad concept, those reviews have only partially tackled the topic, focusing on drainage systems and stormwater infrastructures [13,[19][20][21][22] or green roofs [23,24]. Some other reviews have concentrated their analysis on the links between LCA (among other tools) and more general concepts encompassing NBS, such as environmental sustainability strategies for urban territories [25][26][27]. Nevertheless, no exhaustive works covering a large range of NBS, from NBS on the ground, water-related NBS, building NBS, to NBS strategies, have been conducted so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%