1983
DOI: 10.21236/ada133572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Control of Session Input Rates in Communication Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we devise a simple algorithm for the following problem: Given a finite The main difference between this algorithm and BFS, a change that has been proposed by Gafni [7], is the traversal of the graph according to a labeling of the links and not according to a labeling of nodes. This change is essential as the example in Figure 10 shows.…”
Section: A Linear Time Algorithm For Identifying Independencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we devise a simple algorithm for the following problem: Given a finite The main difference between this algorithm and BFS, a change that has been proposed by Gafni [7], is the traversal of the graph according to a labeling of the links and not according to a labeling of nodes. This change is essential as the example in Figure 10 shows.…”
Section: A Linear Time Algorithm For Identifying Independencementioning
confidence: 99%