2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic discrete choice model for railway ticket cancellation and exchange decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The works of Antonio et al (2017bAntonio et al ( , 2017c, Gayar et al (2011), were the only ones focused on hotels while Lan et al (2011), Lemke et al (2009Lemke et al ( , 2013, Morales & Wang (2010), and Pulugurtha & Nambisan (2003) worked with airlines or employ airline data. Azadeh et al (2013), Cirillo et al (2018), and Tsai (2011) worked with railways. The only document that did not deal with industries related to travel and tourism is that by Metzger et al (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The works of Antonio et al (2017bAntonio et al ( , 2017c, Gayar et al (2011), were the only ones focused on hotels while Lan et al (2011), Lemke et al (2009Lemke et al ( , 2013, Morales & Wang (2010), and Pulugurtha & Nambisan (2003) worked with airlines or employ airline data. Azadeh et al (2013), Cirillo et al (2018), and Tsai (2011) worked with railways. The only document that did not deal with industries related to travel and tourism is that by Metzger et al (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cirillo et al (2018) developed a model to predict when railway customers would exchange or cancel their tickets. All of the previous works employed different methods: time series-based techniques (Lemke et al, 2009(Lemke et al, , 2013, economics-based techniques (Cirillo et al, 2018;Tsai, 2011), and more modern techniques usually applied in machine learning problems, like genetic algorithms, neural networks, or other advanced classification techniques (Antonio et al, 2017b(Antonio et al, , 2017cAzadeh et al, 2013;Morales & Wang, 2010;Pulugurtha & Nambisan, 2003). Except the works by Antonio et al (2017bAntonio et al ( , 2017c and Morales & Wang (2010), who considered bookings cancellation estimation a classification problem, all other authors considered it a regression problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By exposing cancellation drivers, models help hoteliers to develop efficient cancellation policies and overbooking tactics. Authors in [18] proposed a dynamic discrete choice model for ticket cancellation and exchange with an application in the context of railway ticket purchase. Their model did not account for fare correlation among adjacent departure times and assumed that fares are not dependent on the demand.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QoE Cancellation service Data mining Decision aid AHP Arline industry Revenue management [6] --- [7], [8] ---- [9] --- [10], [11], [12] --- [13], [14] ----- [15], [16], [17] ---- [18], [19] ---- [20], [21] ---- [22], [23] -…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, research on passengers' travel preferences has gained popularity. Most studies use a logit model to analyze the choice of passengers between flights or railways by Moeckel et al [29], revealing factors influencing passengers' flight choices by Algers et al [30], Yan et al [31], Hagmann et al [32], and Fleischer et al [33], predicting the total number of air travelers [34], or optimizing passenger flows in a flight network, Dou et al [35] and Yang et al(2017). The above models are only suitable for normal transportation networks, not analysis of passengers' preferences in the case of an accident or disruptions.…”
Section: Passengers Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%