2001
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant–abutment interface: Joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
42
0
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
42
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the literature in the topic is under development, it is general consensus that bone resorption can be reduced when the abutments are smaller than the diameter of the implant body ('platform switching') (5-11, 15, 16). In agreement with recently published studies (17)(18)(19)(20), our results showed that the ED configuration minimized the stresses at the implant/abutment interface region. In addition, the observed stress reduction on the coronal part of bone tissue brought about by the ED configuration with respect to SCD and to WCD configuration amounted to 160% and 33% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Even though the literature in the topic is under development, it is general consensus that bone resorption can be reduced when the abutments are smaller than the diameter of the implant body ('platform switching') (5-11, 15, 16). In agreement with recently published studies (17)(18)(19)(20), our results showed that the ED configuration minimized the stresses at the implant/abutment interface region. In addition, the observed stress reduction on the coronal part of bone tissue brought about by the ED configuration with respect to SCD and to WCD configuration amounted to 160% and 33% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, many implants have been reported in the clinical treatment of a variety of failure of the dental implant. Many causes of failure were associated with the mechanical properties, such as the fracture the oral implant failure [9,10,14] and loosening of the screws and fracture which occurred after implant prosthetic fixture and abutment [15], and causes undue load failure has been reported to cause failure due to the oral environment, such as the oral cavity and poor bone quality, and the like [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also reported for the mechanical properties of the implant in a variety of studies, such as fracture, loosening of the screw phenomenon, fatigue strength, and stress due to the difference between the prosthetic implant made to the fastening system and Osseo integration failure [7,8,9,10]. The hardness of the implant, which is made of commercially pure titanium Grade with the same hardness, has to be compared by the mechanical properties of the implant according to the difference of the coupling method because it is determined by the properties of the alloy, however, previous studies were a mixture of commercially pure titanium Grade 3 and commercially pure titanium Grade 4, so there was a limitation of the comparison of the difference between the coupling method of the implant to the work [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longevity of implant prostheses mainly depends on passive seating and accurate fit of the base of the implant and of the pillar abutment 1 , factors desired by every professional who performs prosthesis implants. Passive seating results in proper dissipation of tension, as the lack of adaptation may lead to screw fracture 2,3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%