2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.31373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Impact Tolerance of Shuttle Orbiter Wing Leading-Edge Panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ERODS needs to be carefully calibrated to facilitate effective modelling of the composite. A value of −0.4 and −0.6 was determined to be suitable for CFRP and GFRP respectively in the simulation, which is in coherence with the data available in the literature [48][49][50]. The material properties used in the numerical simulation are defined in Table 3.…”
Section: Modelling Of External Reinforcementssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The ERODS needs to be carefully calibrated to facilitate effective modelling of the composite. A value of −0.4 and −0.6 was determined to be suitable for CFRP and GFRP respectively in the simulation, which is in coherence with the data available in the literature [48][49][50]. The material properties used in the numerical simulation are defined in Table 3.…”
Section: Modelling Of External Reinforcementssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Similar high element erosion strain values have been observed previously and documented in the published literature for a similar, layered CFRP architecture, 14 a braided CFRP architecture, 17 and a woven ceramic matrix composite. 18 In these articles, the high element erosion values were not determined in systematic manner, unlike the systematic optimization approach reported here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%